.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Monday, September 21, 2009

Edwards Ready To Admit Paternity?

Well, we know that former U.S. CommieCrat Senator, Vice Presidential and Presidential candidate John "The Sissy" Edwards steadfastly denied having an extra-marital affair while his wife, Elizabeth, was battling terminal cancer.

And then he had to admit the affair after it was proven he was lying.



And we know that Edwards steadfastly denied being the father of the child who, amazingly, looks nothing - nothing ! - like him at all.

And now, it appears, that a "secluded" Edwards is ready to admit to paternity. NY Times:

    Mr. Edwards is moving toward an abrupt reversal in his public posture; associates said in interviews that he is considering declaring that he is the father of Ms. Hunter’s 19-month-old daughter, something that he once flatly asserted in a television interview was not possible.

    Friends and other associates of Mr. Edwards and his wife of 32 years, Elizabeth, say she has resisted the idea of her husband’s claiming paternity. Mrs. Edwards, who is battling cancer, “has yet to be brought around,” said one family friend, who like others spoke about the situation on the condition of anonymity, pointing to the complicated and delicate nature of the issue.

    [...]

    The notion that Mr. Edwards is the father has been reinforced by the account of Andrew Young, once a close aide to Mr. Edwards, who had signed an affidavit asserting that he was the father of Ms. Hunter’s child.

    Mr. Young, who has since renounced that statement, has told publishers in a book proposal that Mr. Edwards knew all along that he was the child’s father. He said Mr. Edwards pleaded with him to accept responsibility falsely, saying that would reduce the story to one of an aide’s infidelity.

    In the proposal, which The New York Times examined, Mr. Young says that he assisted the affair by setting up private meetings between Mr. Edwards and Ms. Hunter. He wrote that Mr. Edwards once calmed an anxious Ms. Hunter by promising her that after his wife died, he would marry her in a rooftop ceremony in New York with an appearance by the Dave Matthews Band.

Bwa! "...with an appearance by the Dave Matthews Band." Maybe they could do a cover of J. Geils "Love Stinks?"



Because he is again being proven a liar.

Cheating on his cancer-stricken, terminal wife.

Fathering children out of wedlock and publicly repeatedly denying it.

Watching Liberals being caught in their lies: Priceless.

...Mr. Edwards once calmed an anxious Ms. Hunter by promising her that after his wife died, he would marry her in a rooftop ceremony in New York with an appearance by the Dave Matthews Band...

...Oh, Those Goode Old Fashioned Democrat Family Values!



©2009

Labels: , , , , ,


Comments:
haha
What about if we sugest other bands, like Amy Winehouse? Or Ice T? THAT would be interesting!

Yes, the good old fashion family values.

Before any progresssive say "hey, what about McCain?!" let me just say that I am not too confy with him abandoning his wife like that either. But notice that, as far as I know, he did not father kids WHILE still married with his former wife. No comparation there.
But, yes, it wasn't the best move.
 
Goddamn it, WARN ME before the song kicks in!

It is kinda giddy watching the media catch up to a story... you almost want to treat them like a puppy... rub their noggin, then whack them in the face with a rolled-up piece o' fishwrap.

OT: who wins the NHL "Dick Division"?
 
Mats, LOL! If I would have had the time I would have pho-shopped that J Geils cover into Edwards and Amy Winehouse! Oy, that's funny. What a great idea you spawned in me.

I don't disagree with your take on McCain leaving his first wife. But she said during the campaign last year that she supported him, that there's no animosity between them, so...eh...I just leave that between them. It's their personal lives.

Now, Pretty Boy Johnny lied his backside off, repeatedly saying he didn;t have an affair when he did, and repeatedly denied his paternity. Now...it seems he is ready to admit he is. He's a liar.

Priceless. Just Priceless.

Maybe I am taking too much pleasure in it? Could be. But I'm just using the standards set and applied to other by the LefTards. You know this.
 
TC -

Sorry about no warning. I wanted the audio to kick in as people were reading it for added humor value. See...my blog is a "value added" blog! ;-)

Oooooooh....if Edwards were a Repub his paternity and affair story would be breathlessly covered 48/14. Camera crews would be parked outside Casa de Edwards and we'd have overhead footage from not one, but two, 'copters.

The NHL Dick Division? I'm not sure I know what that is. If it's what I think it is, the self explanatory understanding of it, I will have to ask if you mean by Team or individual or both.

For Team, I'd have to name Detroit or the Oilers.

For Individual: we have to have a bit more of the season play out for me to select one person.

Since you accurately predicted last years Penguins, want to predict this season's Cup teams and winner?
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker



Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.