Thursday, January 08, 2009
Obama And AG Holder To Ban Guns At Will?
Oh, How They'd Looooooooooooove to!
All Headline News reported on September 22, 2008, at a campaign stop in Virginia, Biden said the following:
"I guarantee you Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns, so don't buy that malarkey," Biden is quoted by ABC as saying during the United Mine Workers of America annual fish fry. "Don't buy that malarkey. They're going to start peddling that to you."
"If he tries to fool with my Beretta, he's got a problem. I like that little over and under, you know? I'm not bad with it. So give me a break," he added.
It now looks like the Communist Pbama and Biden, along with their Communist Majority Congress and Communist Attorney General Eric Holder have plans to "ban guns at will."
You remember Holder, right, the guy who designed the pardon of Bubba Clinton's buddy Marc Rich?
You remember Holder...he was in the Number Two spot in the AG office under Mister Janet Reno when the Clinton Administration, Reno, Holder and Weasel Clark killed over 70 innocent Americans in Waco, Texas.
Well, it now seems that Pbama and Holder are supporting a bill - H.R. 1022 - that will ban guns at will. From InfoWars:
Obama’s AG nominee, Eric Holder, may have the ability to ban guns at will. Unruh cites H.R. 1022, sponsored by New York Democrat Carolyn McCarthy and 67 co-sponsors. It was introduced in February 2007 and the next month referred to the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, where it bogged down. “But that could change in the 111th Congress, sworn in today,” writes [Bob] Unruh, who cites Alan Korwin, author of Gun Laws of America. Korwin mentioned H.R. 1022 in a recent commentary.
H.R. 1022 states that “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.”
Korwin said the plan would allow the U.S. Attorney General – possibly Holder – to add to the list of guns banned to the public any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”
“Note that … Holder … wrote a brief in the (District of Columbia) Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home,” Korwin said.
According to Korwin, H.R. 1022 “virtually dismisses the principles of the Second Amendment.”
The Supreme Court decided in the D.C. vs. Heller case that the Second Amendment provides an individual right to own firearms, not just the right for states to form armed militias. Under Obama, all of this may change for the worse.
“But that could change in the 111th Congress, sworn in today,” writes [Bob] Unruh, who cites Alan Korwin, author of Gun Laws of America. Korwin mentioned H.R. 1022 in a recent commentary.
Where's Lee Harvey Oswald when you really need him? Nobody ever commits a crime using anything other than a gun, right?
David Codrea has more on this story at his site, The War On Guns.
Gray Ghost Country
Yeah, Fellatio Joe (GREAT NAME) is a LPOS.
Pbama, Biden and the other ass munchers are going to gut the 2nd Amendment. That's my prediction and I'm sticking to it.
MESSAGE -- NOW RENEWED AS AN ALERT -- TO EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:
When counting the electoral votes, either Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama — not being an Article II “natural born citizen” (father Kenyan/British, not American, citizen) — fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) or thereafter defers to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.
The preferable choice (especially for the Democrats) -- IN WHAT WILL BE THE MOST IMPORTANT AND HISTORIC CONGRESSIONAL VOTE SINCE THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR -- should seem obvious.
*SPECIAL AUDIO LINK MESSAGE TO JOHN MCCAIN:
Links to this post:
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.