.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Obama's Grand Hoax Of Withdrawing
Troops From Iraq And Afghanistan


He's not my Führer!

As a presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, Junior said many times during the course of his campaign that he would "bring the Troops home now."


Americans now realize just how loosely Obama's subjective definition is of "now." Barry has a hard time grasping the concept of the meaning of the word "now." For Barry, "now" apparently means an undefined amount of time which could be quite lengthy...quite lengthy indeed.

January 30, 2007, Obama said bring the Troops home by spring of 2008. MSNBC:

    Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama said Tuesday U.S. combat forces should be out of Iraq by spring 2008 to end “a foreign policy disaster,” but he stopped short of endorsing a cutoff in funds.

September 12, 2007, Obama calls for the immediate withdraw of Troops from Iraq. UPI:

    Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, in a speech in Iowa Wednesday, called for the immediate drawdown of U.S. combat troops in Iraq.

    Under the Illinois senator's plan, combat brigades would immediately begin withdrawing one or two brigades at a time, with a complete withdrawal by the end of 2008, CNN reported.

    "Let me be clear: There is no military solution in Iraq, and there never was. The best way to protect our security and to pressure Iraq's leaders to resolve their civil war is to immediately begin to remove our combat troops," Obama said in his speech. “Not in six months or one year -- now.”

Hmmmmmm..."there is no military solution in Iraq and there never was." And to that I add, "...and there never will be a solution in Iraq as long as Pbama is in office."

February 27, 2009, Obama's plan leaves over 50,000 Troops in Iraq for an indefinite period of time. AntiWar:

    As we reported yesterday, President Obama’s Iraq “withdrawal” plan will leave up to 50,000 troops in a warzone engaging in combat missions. Today the president detailed the plans for members of Congress, and said the remnant forces, which would remain for an indefinite period of time, will be in Iraq to “advise Iraqi troops and protect US interests.”

December 2, 2008, Obama angers his supporters with his Iraq plan. Washington Times:

    Antiwar groups found him too timid, saying Mr. Obama always has left room for keeping troops in Iraq longer than many voters have anticipated.

    "There's a lot of disappointment on the part of the peace movement," said Barbra Bearden, spokeswoman for the national group Peace Action, which has started a "No soldier left behind" program to pressure Mr. Obama to fully remove troops.

DRUM ROLL, PLEASE...

...We now learn that U.S. Troops may be in Iraq and Afghanistan FOR DECADES! APee:

    The United States could have fighting forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for a decade, the top Army officer said, even though a signed agreement requires all U.S. forces to be out of Iraq by 2012.

    Gen. George Casey, Army chief of staff, said Tuesday his planning envisions combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for a decade as part of a sustained U.S. commitment to fighting extremism and terrorism in the Middle East.

Well...U.S. Troops in Iraq FOR DECADES? This certainly isn't what the anti-war Pbama Cultists were promised by their Cult Leader now, is it?

I try to listen for and I try to hear - but I do not - the obedient and dutiful Pbama Cultists screaming:

"Out of Iraq Now!"

"Bring our Troops home now!"

"No More Blood For Oil!"

"No More American Imperialism!"

"Obama is a tool of Big Oil!"

Ahhhhhh, the wonderful hypocrisy of the Pbama Cultists and the Insane Liberal Clown Posse. They are so heavily invested in believing their Führer and so steeped in denial they won't even notice they are being led to the gas chambers.

©2009

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Comments:
This fuckface has gone back on so many campaign promises that delighted the Left that I'm kind of shocked they aren't turning on him.

Between Guantanamo, "torture," the withdrawal timetables, his refusal to directly hold talks with North Korea, his disaster of a policy toward Iran, his backpedaling on his promises of greater transparency, his administration is leaving quite the trail of broken promises after only a few short months.

In some cases, the things he's done have been "worse" in the eyes of the Left than what Dubya Bush had done.

I wonder when his disciples will realize their messiah has been lying to them?
 
The kenyan man currently living in the White House for free sure has a double tongue, doens't he?

I thought he would be the only Chicago politician who is not corrupt, but, I guess I was wrong!
 
Obama is an opportunist of the worst class, he would have said anything to get elected.

As some Everclear song said: "You try to be everything for everyone." Unfortunately, that doesn't work in politics for a long time.

At least John McCain was honest and told the public the truth when he said that USA would be in Iraq for the next 100 years...

So much for McCain, the truth and the Republican party.
 
Storm,

Pbama's Cultists are so steeped in denial I personally don't think they will EVER admit or acknowledge any disagreement of displeasure with anything he does. The Libs will look the other way, just like they did under the abysmal eight years under Bubba Clinton.
 
Mats,

Chicago has corrupt politicians? Naaaaaaaaw. Really? Christ, it is the armpit of corruption, ever since longtime cemetery residents voted for JFK in 1960.

You are spot on Mats.
 
Tym,

And Obama gets the Coveted Free Pass from all those who would poop blood over the same things if being done by W. Bush or any Republican.

Their double standards and hypocrisy never fail to astound me.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker



Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.