Saturday, February 16, 2008
"We're Weak On Terrorism!"
Kudos to House Minority Leader John Boehner for leading the walkout.
The actions of the Democrats on Thursday reinforce only one thing; that Democrats are cowards and weaklings who easily identify with terrorists and are eager to appease them. Democrats are terrorist-friendly who are terrorist sympathizers willing to capitulate to the whims of terrorists and those that sponsor and aid in acts of terrorism. It's the "please don't hit me" syndrome. Well, terrorists don't listen or comply with that request. The only thing they understand is brute force, which is something Democrats wholly lack in any degree.
Carter and Arafat
Democrats are enamored and in love with terrorists. The most recent example of this is the displaying of a Che Guevara flag in the office of a campaign worker working for Ted Kennedy's Poodle.
Democrats are infatuated and smitten by dictators like Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden and Che Guevara. It's easy for Democrats to align themselves with terrorists and dictators because they all share the warped ideology that America is the problem, they are united in Blaming America First.
Democrats constantly display their affection of terrorists and dictators all the time.
We see examples of this all the time, such as Dennis Kookcinich breaking bread with Syrian leader Bashar Assad.
Assad (right), Kookcinich (left)
Nanny Pelosi is another Democrat only too happy to meet with despots and terrorists. Last April, 2007, Pelosi would not attend General David Petraeus' Iraq War briefing, but she managed to clear her schedule and made time to meet with Assad
Pelosi and Assad
Who can forget - except the Democrats - the Clinton Administration's complete and total appeasement of North Korean leader Kimmy Jong Il by then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright?
Kimmy and Albright
Worst President Ever Jimmy Carter has spent a lifetime siding with Palestinian terrorists. As president, Carter ended the U.S. relationship with Taiwan in 1978 and instead recognized Communist China. Carter and his National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski were the first to secretly fund Islamic terrorists in 1979. Oh, the Left loves to point to Ronald Regan and Iran Contra - but Cater-Brzezinski are the true originators of funding terrorists.
Assad and Kerry
If you think Democrats are not appeasers of terrorists, then you need to look again at the above photographs. All photos found via image search on Google and none have been Photo Shopped by me. They are as they were found.
How many times have both Bill Clinton and Democrat Senator John Kerry harshly criticized the United States while they stood on foreign soil? I've lost count.
Bill Clinton's most frequent foreign White House guest was Yasser Arafat.
Clinton and Arafat
Clinton did not want to pursue Osama Bin Laden because instead of treating Bin Laden as a terrorist, Clinton repeated said there were no real criminal charges with which to charge Bin Laden.
Clinton handed Bin Laden a Free Ticket To Terrorism when Clinton pulled troops out of Somalia. Bin Laden, in an ABC News interview stated emphatically that he knew America was weak when Clinton pulled out of Somalia.
Bin Laden said so himself. Mark Silverberg Archives:
In his 1996 "Declaration of War Against the Americans," Osama bin Laden cited the U.S. retreat from Somalia in 1993: "You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew. The extent of your impotence and weaknesses has become very clear," he said. “When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature they will like the strong horse.”
Judging magnanimity as weakness, the half-educated in al Qaeda embraced the concept that the "soft" West was not prepared to defend its strategic interests. This perception became provocative. From Beirut to the Hezbollah kidnappings and executions of American diplomats in the 1980s, to Somalia (1993), to the first attempt to bring down the World Trade Center (1993), to the Khobar Towers (1996) and African embassy bombings (1998) to the USS Cole (2000), America responded with lawyers not marines to deal with "criminals" not terrorists.
Democrats are appeasers, pacifists and chickenhawks. They are the first to run away from a confrontation. They are the first to back down in fight. They are first to place blame on anyone but themselves when a catastrophic incident occurs.
The warning signs of a massive terrorist attack on the domestic shores of the United States were ignored by the Clinton Administration as far back as 1995. AIM:
In 1995, the CIA and the FBI learned that Osama bin Laden was planning to hijack U.S. airliners and use them as bombs to attack important targets in the U.S. This scheme was called Project Bojinka. It was discovered in the Philippines, where authorities arrested two of bin Laden's agents, Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Hakim Murad.
Project Bojinka was known to the CIA and the FBI. It was described in court documents in the trial in New York of Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Murad for their participation in the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993.
Clinton was, and is, a devious individual, because of the inability for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with each other, there was no way to connect the dots.
Carter, in 1979, began rolling out the red carpet for terrorists to attack us. Clinton opened the doors and invited them in. We paid the price in September, 2001.
No wonder House Republicans walked out on Thursday. Republicans understand the genuine threat that terrorism presents to the U.S. and our allies. The Democrats are clueless on this issue. They do not consider the treat of terrorism real because they identify with, and have the same mindset as do the terrorist.
Labels: Cowardly Liberals
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.