.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Friday, May 29, 2009

Sotomayor's Virulent And Rabid
Anti-Second Amendment Views

From InfoWars:

    Sotomayor on the Supreme Court: A Gun-grabber’s Dream Come True

    Obama Supreme Court pick Sonia Sotomayor believes that suspects captured on the battlefield must receive all rights afforded to American citizens under the Constitution. That’s the good news. Now here’s the bad. She thinks American citizens don’t have the right to own firearms.

    As a graduate student at Princeton University, Sotomayor wrote a these entitled “Deadly Obsession: American Gun Culture.” In the text, Sotomayor makes the argument that the Second Amendment does not actually afford individual citizens the right to bear arms. She believes only the military has this right. According to Sotomayor, it has been illegal for individuals to own firearms since the passing of the Bill of Rights.

    In 2004, in U.S. v. Sanchez-Villar, a three-judge panel that included Sotomayor wrote that “the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.” In another case, Sotomayor ruled that it is illegal for citizens to keep nunchakus in their homes.

    Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, said on Wednesday that “Judge Sotomayor’s position on the Second Amendment is a clear signal that Mr. Obama’s claim that he supports gun rights is nothing but lip service,” reports CBS News.

    “Judge Sotomayor’s record suggests hostility, rather than empathy, for the tens of millions of Americans who exercise their right to keep and bear arms,” said Dave Kopel of the Independence Institute.

    Ken Blackwell of the Family Research Council believes her nomination amounts to “a declaration of war against America’s gun owners.”

    Earlier this year, Sotomayor ruled that states do not have to obey the Second Amendment’s commandment that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, according to CNSNews. In Maloney v. Cuomo, Sotomayor signed an opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that said the Second Amendment does not protect individuals from having their right to keep and bear arms restricted by state governments.

The InfoWars author calls Sotomayor a, "notorious gun-grabber."



From PR Newswire:

    Failing to get traction for his anti-gun agenda in Congress, Barack Obama is trying instead to stack the federal courts with liberal anti-gunners, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.

    "President Obama's gun prohibitionist agenda has fallen on deaf ears on Capitol Hill," said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. "His administration's attempt to revive the ban on semiautomatic sporting rifles by exploiting the Mexican drug war was a bust. He had to sign legislation allowing guns for personal protection in national parks, even after his Justice Department refused to defend the Interior Department against a lawsuit that prevented an earlier firearms rule from taking effect.

    "But now he is picking judicial nominees that will almost certainly legislate from the bench," he continued. "Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor has already ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. We've learned that Sotomayor's nomination is supported by ACORN, the publicly-funded anti-gun group that supported a Jersey City gun control ordinance that was struck down by the court.

    "Obama's nomination of David Hamilton to a position on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals is equally troubling," Gottlieb added, "because Hamilton reportedly is a former ACORN fundraiser. Even the president once worked with the anti-gun rights ACORN as a leadership trainer."

Read both linked articles in their entirety.

Labels: , , , , , ,


Comments:
Well I guess you can't blame her wanting to ban guns. With face like that she risks becoming a rug every hunting season.
 
Scroto-mayor is a radical liberal which by definition means that she is an anti-gun proponent. There is always a cycle of about every 50-60years or so when the 2nd Amendment is severely challenged. It was in vogue at the time when this scrotum-faced cunt wrote her thesis in a lame attempt to be all cutting edge and show her ultra-lberal side by trying to tackle an issue to earn herself a reputation as a progressive thinker. She is far too stupid and self-absorbed to realize that legal minds 10 times smarter than her (if "it" is really a her) have tried and failed. We all know that just recently the Supreme Court had a ruling that the 2nd Amendment did indeed “protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for such activities as hunting and self-defense.” Should we start a pool and try and guess how soon this latest decision will be over-turned when this ass-faced gash gets on the bench? You should also do a story about her in the "La Raza" and what all that stands for if you have the stomach for it that is....
 
Molson - HA! Where's Ed Gein when you need him to make some lampshades out of human skin, or a nice fuzzy (nappy?) rug out that oil slick she calls hair, huh? (I can't believe I just wrote that, but the effect of humor always trumps that of "taste.")
 
Theodore, well said, I agree with you completely.

Sotocunt is not an intellectual giant or a great thinker - she's not even close. Her ball is nowhere near the fairway - she's landed in the rough and isn't going anywhere. (Sorry for the golf analogies).

"Ass-faced Gash." I LOVE that term!

I'm somewhat familiar with her La Raza speech and outright sympathy for minorities and her hatred toward white people ala Frank Ricci.

And The Left ripped on Harriet Myers? She's Einstein compared to the "ass-faced-gash."
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker



Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.