Saturday, May 17, 2008
Obama Isn't A U.S. Citizen?
The Obamalith claims he was born in Hawaii. Yet, Hawaii's statehood was never ratified in its 1893 Treaty. Technically, Hawaii is "occupied" - annexed is the more appropriate word - by the United States. Neither was Hawaiian statehood approved or sanctioned by its Royalty or Queen Liliuokalani, nor did native Hawaiians ever have the opportunity to vote for or against statehood!
So it would appear that The Affirmative Action Candidate lacks the citizenship credentials to occupy the White House!
And no, it's not just me saying this. It is an issue raised by a blogger and Obama supporter who lives in Hawaii:
Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
If you consider the history and believe that Hawaii is not legally a part of the United States, as many do, then one might ask, is Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?
One could even make the argument that being born in Hawaii, he's a Hawaiian national! I believe the most compelling legal analysis based on Hawaiian kingdom and international law and precedent, is that the Hawaiian national population today is comprised of descendants of Hawaiian subjects and those foreigners who were born in the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1898.
As an American, I participate in the political system that's been imposed here, and as a Democrat, I will be caucusing for Obama[.]
...for the presidency, the constitution specifies not just nationality, but a "natural born citizen" so my understanding is that jus sanguinis does not apply to that specific requirement, only jus soli. One has to be born in the United States to be president, and technically, Obama wasn't.
In that case, "Aloha, Affirmative Action Candidate! Aloha!"
The last thing we need is a President who would be friendly to subversive ideology that is not in the best interests of the United States for no other reason than he is not a U.S. citizen. The second-to-the-last thing we need is a subversive President who is secretly a Muslim and whose policies are anything but in the best interest of our country.
As are children born of a Jewish mother automatically considered included in the Jewish faith, the same holds true with Islam. The children born of a Muslim father are considered included in the Islamic faith. Obama's biological father - as far was we know - was a Muslim. Obama's stepfather was an Indonesian Muslim. The Islamic religion would deem Obama as an apostate Muslim, which in no way means that he cannot someday revert back to his Islamic faith.
What if Obama is elected and after being sworn into office he decides to convert back to the Islamic religion? This could easily happen and this alone is a reason to deny him the presidency.
Obama is a Muslim, perhaps a furtive Muslim, but nevertheless a Muslim. But far more important and significant, his citizenship - or more appropriately, his lack of it - may disqualify him from the office he seeks.
The citizenship of Ted Kennedy's Poodle needs to be vetted. We need to see his original and certified birth certificate. We need to see the original and certified birth certificates of his mother and his Muslim father. We need irrefutable evidence that The Obamalith is a United States Citizen and that he meets every Constitutional requirement necessary which qualifies him as a legitimate U.S. citizen and as a legal candidate for the White House. To date, Obama has not proven this beyond any reasonable doubt.
I'm surprised that the Clinton Crime Family hasn't yet brought this issue into the spotlight. Maybe this is their "June surprise".
Hey, Angelo, you want to read some really deranged and maladjusted shit, check out Daily Kos, or Eschaton, or Think Regress, or DemocratUnderPants.
I've not made any outrageous claims or perpetuated boldfaced lies. You simply cannot handle the truth. God Bless Idiots, they deserve life too!
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.