Monday, June 18, 2007
Veterans Against The War
Excluded From Parade
Groucho Marx said "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." I wonder of Groucho realized the Hegelianism magnitude and profundity of what he said?
On Saturday, June 16, an anti-war Veteran's group was refused permission to participate in a Virginia, Minnesota parade, the Land of The Loon Festival.
According to the AP Story:
"Three weeks ago they told us we could be in their parade," said Gary Sorenson, president of the Duluth chapter of the national Veterans For Peace organization. "Then on Thursday someone called and said we were uninvited."
Sorenson said the local chapter has about 30 members. The group planned to pull its float in the Land of The Loon Arts and Crafts Festival parade in Virginia, about an hour west of Duluth. The float has a banner that reads, "For the mothers, for the the soldier, for the planet, no more war." It's pulled by a truck with a sign that tallies the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq.
I'm not against people or groups who choose to exercise their First Amendment Rights in protesting the War in Iraq or any other war or issue. I'm not against civil disobedience by people or groups who have contrarian messages. I'm not for any deliberate attempt to silence dissenting voices. But no one or group has the right to insert themselves in an environment or forum - in this case a parade - sponsored by a private organization, promoter or patron.
Unsubstantiated allegations were made that the local chapter of Veterans of Foreign Wars refused to march in the parade if Sorenson's group was included. Jerry Trunzo, commander of VFW Post 4456, denied any such claim. Sorenson countered that parade organizers didn't want anything "politically controversial" in the parade. Well...maybe, maybe not..."he said"/"she said". Yadda yadda.
The simple answer to Sorenson Veterans For Peace perceived faux-discrimination is obtaining a permit from the city and having their own anti-war/peace parade, nothing prevents him from doing so. But then what I suspect - his motive of causing and wanting to create controversy - is removed from the setting and receives little, if any, publicity.
Groucho, somewhere in the afterlife - probably puffing away on a big stogie and having a darn good time with his cohorts - must be looking down from the heavens wondering why any group would want to be part of a parade that doesn't want them.
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.