.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Harry Reid Tap Dances
On The Head Of An Abortion Pin




Well, hardly a tap dance.

Harry Reid, Democrat Senator from Nevada, Real Estate Mogul and Milk-Dairy Magnate has some issues with the Supreme Court Ruling on Abortion:

    WASHINGTON, April 18 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Today, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) made a comment apparently disparaging the Supreme Court's decision on banning the gruesome procedure known as Partial Birth Abortion. When asked about the decision Senator Reid replied:

    "I would only say that this is the only decision a lot of us wish that Alito weren't there and O'Connor were there."

Oh, That Harry! Solidly on the side of pro-choicers, jumping on the bandwagon of pandering to the pro-choicers.

And what's the slur directed at Justice Sam Alito? The Supreme Court's decision majority opinion was
authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy - a Republican, yes - who - if you bother to look it up - has voted with both the "conservative" members of the Court and at other times voted with the "liberal" members of the Court. So why drag Sam Alito in? It's just red meat for Reid's pro-choice constituents.

Why is Reid pretending to be ashamed of the SCOTUS ruling and jumping on the "I'm a pro-choicer, too" bandwagon when he voted twice in his past to ban partial birth abortion? Who are you trying to fool, Harry?


What is Harry's voting record on abortion?

Let's take a peek, shall we. And yes, the bolding is mine:

    Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
    Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
    Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
    Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
    Rated 29% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)

So Harry voted for banning partial birth abortion twice, in March 2003 and October 1999.

Yet look at his politically calculated response: "I would only say that this is the only decision a lot of us wish that Alito weren't there and O'Connor were there."

Awwwww, break out the tears Harry. You don't expect to be believed, do you? Are the words "consistency" and "sincerity" in your vocabulary, Harry? Have you ever heard those terms? Are you at all familiar with them?

Also very odd, from the perspective of how and why Liberals eat their own, somehow - magically, Reid receives a low 29% approval from NARAL - self-described "nation's leading advocate for privacy and a woman's right to choose - while that "Republican Tool" Joe Lieberman receives a 100% approval from NARAL and, Lieberman
the opposite from that of Liberal Party "Leader" Reid Voted:

    Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
    Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
    Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
    Voted NO on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
    Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record. (Dec 2003)

Remind me, who was it again, Reid or Lieberman - that Democrats say isn't "Democratic" enough for them?

Just another in a long, never ending line of pure, rank, stinky Democrat Hypocrisy.

Will the media jump on this and ask Reid why the obvious hypocrisy and inconsistencies from his recent comments compared to how he voted? Do wild cornish game hens conduct orchestras performing Mozart? Not in my world.


I hear he still has plenty of acreage for sale...



©2007

Labels:


Comments:
hello,
welcome to my blog.http://www.heyueqin.blogspot.com
 
you too, welcome. how did you find my blog?
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker



Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.