Sunday, August 19, 2007
Tunick, I Still Don't Know Why This Is "Art"
I still don't know why it is considered art. It's not the nudity, that part of Tunick's series of photographs, or any other - I'm no prude - doesn't bother me. I'm not saying Tunick isn't a good photographer, he is. But I still can't figure out why being nekkid on a Swiss glacier is art. This isn't a glacier whose ice is used for bottled water, is it?
Labels: Stanley Tunick
Comments:
<< Home
I guess the determination of what is art is somewhat subjective kind of like refering to Al Gore as a climatologist. Now your depiction of Al Gore as "The Rectal Thermometer of the World" was spot on. It still cracks me up.
Maybe from overhead, like a plane, it all the naked people show some geometric art? I dunno. The Rectal Thermometer! Yeah, thanks - I think you mentioned you saved that as a screensaver. That's funny.
Post a Comment
<< Home
Alabama Internet
This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.