Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Polls Show Majority Of Americans Support Ethnic/Terrorist Profiling And Consider September 11 Attack More Significant Than The Attack on Pearl Harbor
Not long ago the Quinnipiac poll was touted by Liberals as The Greatest Thing Since Sliced Bread. If memory serves me right, I think many Libs (those on Liberal Talk Radio) bowed and worshipped the Quinnipiac poll that showed, prior to the primary election, Ned Lamont beating Joe Lieberman in Connecticut.
Well, the same pollster - Quinnipiac - shows that 60 percent to 37 percent margin, respondents said authorities should single out people who look "Middle Eastern" for security screening at locations such as airports and train stations -- a finding that drew sharp criticism by civil liberties groups.
60 percent to 37 percent! Why, that's a Michael "Fat Bastard" Moore sized gap between those who FAVOR "Middle Eastern" profiling and those who are against it!
And the poor peeing-in-their-pants civil liberties groups are all bent out of shape about these results. Well, that should tell you volumes about the differences between people who honestly want to combat terrorism and consider it a very real threat and those who prefer to pacify terrorists at any cost, especially the cost of maybe "insulting" them (G A S P)!
Quinnipiac also found that 56 percent of voters [polled] picked Sept. 11 as more significant, while 33 percent picked Pearl Harbor. Voters older than 65 picked Sept. 11 as more significant 42 percent of the time, compared to 39 percent for Pearl Harbor.
Since Liberals loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooove polls, because polls "tell them" how to pander to their constituents, and since Liberals loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooove the Quinnipiac poll, I'm sure they'll adopt a brand new outlook on profiling, won't they?
Gee, do you think Liberal Politicians will glom onto these results in the hopes that by doing so they will be elected or re-elected? C'mon Libs --- you're the group that took poll results as gospel during the Clinton Administration. Will you put these two Quinnipiac polls where your mouth is? My bookie cautions not to bet on it.
©2006
Well, the same pollster - Quinnipiac - shows that 60 percent to 37 percent margin, respondents said authorities should single out people who look "Middle Eastern" for security screening at locations such as airports and train stations -- a finding that drew sharp criticism by civil liberties groups.
60 percent to 37 percent! Why, that's a Michael "Fat Bastard" Moore sized gap between those who FAVOR "Middle Eastern" profiling and those who are against it!
And the poor peeing-in-their-pants civil liberties groups are all bent out of shape about these results. Well, that should tell you volumes about the differences between people who honestly want to combat terrorism and consider it a very real threat and those who prefer to pacify terrorists at any cost, especially the cost of maybe "insulting" them (G A S P)!
Quinnipiac also found that 56 percent of voters [polled] picked Sept. 11 as more significant, while 33 percent picked Pearl Harbor. Voters older than 65 picked Sept. 11 as more significant 42 percent of the time, compared to 39 percent for Pearl Harbor.
Since Liberals loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooove polls, because polls "tell them" how to pander to their constituents, and since Liberals loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooove the Quinnipiac poll, I'm sure they'll adopt a brand new outlook on profiling, won't they?
Gee, do you think Liberal Politicians will glom onto these results in the hopes that by doing so they will be elected or re-elected? C'mon Libs --- you're the group that took poll results as gospel during the Clinton Administration. Will you put these two Quinnipiac polls where your mouth is? My bookie cautions not to bet on it.
©2006
Alabama Internet
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.
