.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

August Deadliest Month In Afghanistan

Oh, Lordy Day, when will enough American and Allied Blood and Treasure be enough for Dear Leader His Excellency Barack Hussein Obama, Junior's illegal occupation of Afghanistan? His insatiable appetite for war, blood, flesh and destruction knows no end.

August is the most deadliest month in Afghanistan, ever. APee:

    An American service member died Friday when his vehicle struck a bomb in eastern Afghanistan, making August the deadliest month for U.S. forces in the nearly eight-year war.

    The grim milestone comes as the top U.S. commander prepares to submit his assessment of the conflict — a report expected to trigger intense debate on the Obama administration's strategy in an increasingly unpopular war.

    The latest death was reported as Afghan officials announced an 80 percent increase in the number of major fraud allegations submitted after last week's disputed presidential election — a sign of the deep challenges facing the U.S. and its allies in shoring up a legitimate Afghan government capable of withstanding the Taliban insurgency, corruption and drug trafficking.


    American casualties have been rising steadily following President Barack Obama's decision to send 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan to combat a resurgent Taliban and train Afghan security forces to assume a greater role in battling the insurgents.

    Obama's decision was part of a strategic shift in the U.S. war against international Islamic extremism — moving resources from Iraq, which had been center stage since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion but where violence has declined sharply from levels of two years ago.

    A record 62,000 U.S. troops are now in the country, with 4,000 more due before year's end. That compares with about 130,000 in Iraq, most due to leave next year.

    Since the fresh troops began arriving in Afghanistan last spring, U.S. deaths have climbed steadily — from 12 in May to more than 40 for the past two months as American forces have taken the fight to the Taliban in areas of the country which have long been under insurgent control.

He's not my Führer!

Afghanistan - where U.S. and Allied Troops made progress under the Bush Admin - is now a war being lost under the Obama Admin. In fact, the Taliban is winning. al-Reuters:

    ...the new strategy being put into place has to show convincing results before public disenchantment with the war saps Obama's credibility and throws question marks over his judgment. Already, according to public opinion polls in August, a majority of Americans say the war is not worth fighting. Almost two thirds think the United States will eventually withdraw without winning.

    There are similar feelings in Britain, which fields the second-largest contingent of combat troops in Afghanistan after the United States. A poll published in London this week showed that 69 percent of those questioned thought British troops should not be fighting in Afghanistan.

    In the United States, almost inevitably in a country that never forgot the trauma of the only war it ever lost, 36 years ago, pundits are conjuring up the ghost of Vietnam. A lengthy analysis in the New York Times wondered whether Obama was fated to be another Lyndon B. Johnson, the president who kept escalating the Vietnam war.

    The war in Afghanistan is drawing into its ninth year and chances are it will still be going when Obama is gearing up for his campaign for re-election in 2012. According to a study by the RAND institute, a think tank working for the military, counter-insurgency campaigns won by the government have averaged 14 years.

    "The insurgent wins if he does not lose," according to the U.S. Army's counter-insurgency manual, "while the counterinsurgent loses if he does not win.["]


    In Afghanistan, the Taliban insurgents not only have been winning by not losing, they have actually been gaining ground. In the words of the top U.S. military officer, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen, the situation in Afghanistan "is serious and is deteriorating."

Under Pbama, Afghanistan is "deteriorating."

The anti-war Insane Liberal Clown Posse (ILCP) and the Pillow-Biting Pbama Cultists sure are silent over the mishandling of Afghanistan by their Warmongering Cult Leader Pbama, aren't they?

What are the objectives in Afghanistan for Obama? What are the benchmarks? How is progress - rather, the lack of it - being measured and what is being done about it? When will the Afghanistan government step up to the plate? All these were questions from The Liberals during the W. Bush Admin. Now...we hear none of this from them.

Where is the "War is always wrong. Always," crowd these days? They sure were shrill during the Bush Admin. I wonder what's changed? It sure is a mystery. One of those mysteries ensconced inside an enigma wrapped inside a riddle inside a paradox wrapped and covered by a sausage. Yep...it sure is a mystery.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

So what was Fraudy's plan when sending the troops. Guess he didn't have one. Where have we heard this before? Hmmmm. A real leftarded mystery. Well I might like to gloat at yet another one of Fraudy's epic failures, but I can't. This one is costing American lives. It is not funny. Fraudy best get his shit together and solve some real problems instead of creating new ones. He wants everyone to shut-up and stand aside. No criticism to the false prophet. Well the MSM has shut-up. They are standing aside. Where's the success? All I'm seeing is a lot of lefty suck... a whole lot of it. EPIC FAIL!
And today the news reported that MORE AMERICAN Troops may be sent to Afghanistan. Oh shit almighty, if it was Bush requesting the same LefTardia would be apoplectic.

You are so right, Obama's abject failure in Afghanistan is costing American lives and lives of our Allies. It's Vietnam all over again. The Russians had their asses handed to them in a decade-long conflict in Afghanistan. What did Fraudy lean from that? Absolutely nothing.
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker

Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.