.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Sotomayor Ruling Overturned In New Haven Firefighter Case Ricci v DeStefano

Woooooooooooooo Hooooooooooooooo!

Nominee for the Supreme Court, the "Reverse Racist" Sonnia Sotomayor witnessed her ruling in New Haven Firefighter case Ricci v DeStefano OVERTURNED. USA MacPaper:

    The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of white Connecticut firefighters in a 5-4 ruling that reverses an appeals court finding by Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, the Associated Press reports.

    The high court found that the firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.

    Update at 10:38 a.m. ET: The court ruled that New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the AP says. The city said that it had acted to avoid a lawsuit from minorities.

    “Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer’s reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions,” Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his opinion for the court. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

Kennedy, I will remind all of the Liberals and Progressive, has more often than not sided with the Liberal justices on the Supreme Court. This time, he made the right call.

Dissenting Justices were Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens.

I love the Libs out there who agreed with Sotomayor's original decision. They say, yeah, make the test easier for minorities. Yeah, that's just what we need in a firefighter, huh? Someone who passed the test because it was made "easier." Do you want a person who passed a test because it was made "easier" rescuing you or your loved ones from a burning home?

How about a doctor? Do you want a doctor treating you who passed his exams because a test was made "easier," taking into account his/her minority status? If you do, great, book him as your personal physician. But allow the rest of us to seek out the person best qualified for the job, not someone who passed a test because it was made "easier."

You Liberals and Progressives are stupid. You do know that, right?

Sotomayor has a 60 percent failure rate and she says she was inspired to enter the law profession by Nancy Drew novels.

She's a legal lightweight. She has no business being a Supreme Court nominee. She is horribly under-qualified for the position. But she's a woman and she's not white...and that's why FraudyObama nominated her and that is the only reason. Bork her. Bork her good.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

She deserves a triple Borking. The RINO's are probably too chicken shit to do it though. Her blatant failure has impressed Fraudy though. Fraudy likes to surround himself with failures, scammers, and tax cheats.
Affirmative Action Sonia showing why was she picked by President Hussein Junior.

The RINO's are probably too chicken shit to do it though.

YES YES YES! They will cave like the moderate, spineless POS they are. Watch and see! You are so frekkin' right on the money with your statement. SPOT ON, my friend!

you are SPOT ON the money too!

We know why she was picked. She has a vagina and she's not "whitey." Exactly...you nailed it! That is why Pbama nom'd her. No doubt about it.
Note to Brenda whose comment I did not publish:

Brenda, your comment borders on racism, if in fact (and I'm trying to be objective here) it doesn't well crossover the line into abject racism.

The quote about Sotomayor castrating white men is a hoax. Please research it on your own and seek the truth.
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker

Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.