Sunday, June 28, 2009
Frank Lombard of Duke U. Caught In Sex Sting Operation
Frank Lombard, associate director at Duke U's Global Health Institute, was arrested Wednesday after offering his 5-year old adopted son for sex. ABC News:
A Duke University official has been charged in federal court with offering his 5-year-old adopted son up for sex. Frank Lombard, associate director at the university's Global Health Institute, was arrested Wednesday in Raleigh, the FBI said.
[...]
[An] informant told investigators he had met Lombard on the Internet four years ago. The informant described in graphic detail how he allegedly observed Lombard molesting an African-American child on four occasions over an Internet video chat service called ICUii.
The informant said, according to court papers, that Lombard, who is white, said that he lived in the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina and that the child was one of two adopted African-Americans in his custody.
Lombard has been charged with attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with a child, punishable by a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
Lombard allegedly used the adult Internet service to conduct his video chats. According to an affidavit in support of the arrest warrant, the Internet service indicated that Lombard's profile "stated he was interested in "perv fam fun," a reference to "incestuous child molestation." The service also told investigators that a customer service complaint had been sent to the company in January 2007. A customer who had chatted with Lombard complained to the company that Lombard said he was "into incest" and had adopted two African-American children, court records said. [Any Progressive want to make a case for gay adoption? - Drake]
A Washington, D.C., police detective who was investigating the case set up undercover chats with someone matching Lombard's description during which the detective says he was invited to fly to Raleigh to have sex with the person's 5- year-old adopted child. In his affidavit, Det. Timothy Palchak wrote that he engaged in a chat with someone using the screen name "FL" who provided nude pictures of himself. The pictures matched Lombard's North Carolina driver's license photo, according to the affidavit.
During the chats, according to the affidavit, whom he adopted as an infant, and that he had allowed others to molest his child. "FL" told undercover investigators that he had himself molested his child,"FL" stated that "the abuse of the child was easier when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening, but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the molestation," Palchak wrote in his affidavit.
I'm going to make a sweeping generalization: Most people employed in the educational system are Liberals. A steak dinner wager says this guy is a raging, psychopathic Liberal.
Lombard's Facebook page.
From Right Pundits: "The search warrant produced five computers, a sex toy, two webcams and numerous other items."
The warrant (pdf) states Lombard lives in Durham with his gay partner.
ABC Local WTVD News reports the following:
[Lombard] told the investigator "he could not molest the adopted 5-year-old child when his partner was around, however the partner was leaving for a four-day business trip the next day, which would allow him the ability to molest the child just as he did the last time his partner had left town."
©2009
Labels: Frank Lombard, Various Democrat Perverts
I'm certain Lombard was a Lib.
Anyway, isn't gay adoption great for kids?
"Homosexual rapes adopted black child"
wow! That would stir some problems!
That's a GREAT post headline. Sure it's okay, dude, you're the one who thought of it! Kudos!
What POS Lombard is, huh?
Oh, hell yes, the MSM would have been reporting this story, hyping it more than anything if he had been a Repub.
You HAD TO have noticed how no one in the MSM is reporting on this story. Not surprising, though, is it?
You don't know what you're talking about. If you have some evidence to prove your point, I'd like to see it.
"A homosexual man is 44 times more likely to be a pedophile than a heterosexual male." - Alfred Kinsey who, in 1948, after extensive studies conclued that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.
Journal of Sex Research in 1989 found "the proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger than the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men.
The study also concluded that pedophilia is more closely linked with homosexuality than with hetero sexuality.”
Other studies have shown that homosexual teachers are from 90 to 100 times more likely to molest students than heterosexual teachers.
Researcher Paul Cameron in Psychological Reports, 1985: "153 pederasts sexually molested 22,981 boys over an average period of 22 years, while 224 pedophiles molested 4,435 girls over an aver age period of 18 years.
I have my facts all in a row to support what I said.
Do you?
Must... close ... eyes.... while i can... Must not... argh.... read facts... . the pain the pain!!!
/liberal
I wonder if we'll hear back from the very brave and courageous "Anonymous"?
<< Home
Alabama Internet
This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.