Thursday, October 23, 2008
Sarah Palin's $150,000 Clothing Allowance
BFD. The RNC and Palin were doing exactly what Barack Hussein Obama, Junior wants them to do; spreading the wealth around. What's wrong with that? That's what The Liberal Messiah says he will do if elected.
Meanwhile, take a look at what the Obama campaign spends money on. Open Secrets:
[To date, Obama has spent $187.85 million dollars on media].
[...]
Fundr Direct Mail/Telemarketing: $23,527,966
Polling/Surveys/Research: $21,500,862
Parties (Fed & Non-federal): $3,775,359
Broadcast Media: $160,446,232
Charitable Donations: $26,455
$21.5 Million on polling. On Polling, mind you!
Parties: Damn near $4 Million. I guess the economy is increasing the prices of cocaine, crack and pot too. Hey, dealers have bills to pay! The price of illegal drugs apparently has gone up since Obama was puffing on pot and crack on a regular basis.
$160.4 Million on Broadcast media, when the media is entirely in the tank for Obama already!
And a paltry, miserly sum of $26,455 to charity. Disgusting with a capital "D". Well, Liberals are certainly not known for their charity, altruism or goodwill, this much we know. We know this because the Obamas charitable donations are atrociously cheap and the Bidens are even more miserly when it comes to charity than the Obamas!
Hot Air points out that there is nothing illegal or against FEC regulations with the RNC spending money for clothing for Governor Palin; not unless she planned to keep the clothing which she does not.
The Liberals and The Obama Cultists, in a weak and flaccid attempt, are trying to tie this $150,000 story into Palin's reimbursed expenditures in Alaska, which has all been vetted and found to be within the law.
Palin was reimbursed for expenses and received per diems all according to what is allowed and permitted under the law. WaPo:
Gubernatorial spokeswoman Sharon Leighow said Monday that Palin's expenses are not unusual and that, under state policy, the first family could have claimed per diem expenses for each child taken on official business but has not done so.
[...]
"As a matter of protocol, the governor and the first family are expected to attend community events across the state," she said. "It's absolutely reasonable that the first family participates in community events."
The state finance director, Kim Garnero, said Alaska law exempts the governor's office from elaborate travel regulations. Said Leighow: "The governor is entitled to a per diem, and she claims it."
[...]
But Leighow said many of the hundreds of invitations Palin receives include requests for her to bring her family, placing the definition of "state business" with the party extending the invitation.
Let's not forget here, it is not Sarah Palin who has her own, personal, fitness trainer that she sees four times a week. No, that honor goes to Michelle Pickles Obama, The Dangerous Washerwoman.
©2008
Labels: Election 2008, Michelle Obama, Osama Obama, Sarah Palin
It's the same tired double standard from the Libs, Bug. We both know no Republican candidate could raise the sums Obammy has and Liberals not say, "he's buying the White House." But when one of their own does it, they are suddenly stricken mute. Amazing, isn't it?
<< Home
Alabama Internet
This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.