Saturday, February 16, 2008
Larry Sinclair Claims Barack Obama Acquired Cocaine For Him & That Sinclair Performed Oral Sex On Obama In 1999
Larry Sinclair claims that in November 1999, he met Barack Obama at an upscale Chicago nightclub. Sinclair claims Obama "acquired" powder cocaine for him (Sinclair) and rock cocaine for himself (Obama).
Sinclair claims he performed oral sex on Obama.
The below Sinclair video is located here as are others.
The Smoking Gun is reporting as of February 14, 2008 - ironically Valentines Day - Sinclair has filed a federal lawsuit against the presidential candidate and the Democratic party, charging that he is being subjected to a vicious slander campaign.
Labels: Larry Sinclair and Obama
"I blew Senator Obama." Great way to get your fifteen minutes. It's the Monica Lewinsky PR move.
Please remember with whom we are dealing.
I think the Sinclair video is fair game, and I think Obama should be asked about the allegations.
I watched the others - I think there is a total of 4 Sinclair videos.
To me, it appears Sinclair has no ulterior motive in what he is saying. I don't think any other candidate or organization has put him up to this.
I think Sinclair is legit. I may be wrong, but nothing indicateds he's saying what he is saying for any other reason than it did happen.
Of course, if Sinclair said what he said and it was about a Republican, we'd be hearing nothing but that from the MSM and traditional media.
Gee, let’s ask Tucker Carlson and John Fund - hardly standard-bearers for the liberal media - since they were both falsely acccused of sexual improriety by two DIFFERENT crazy people. Look it up.
Type in either one of their names and the word “rape” into Google and you’ll see it for yourself.
Any loon can make a charge against someone.
As Carlson said, it used to be that when a sex scandal broke, if the actual charge wasn’t true, at least something was - the candidate or person accused did something sexual.
Then he was accused of rape in Louisville by some woman. He spent thousands of dollars not only proving he wasn’t there at the time of the alleged rape - but also that he had never been to Louisville in this entire life!!!!
Perhaps the standard of accuracy in a major media-story should be a little higher than a self-recorded You Tube video, a self-respresented case filed in Federal Court (which would accept my lawsuit against the moon for shining too bright - if I had the filing fee) and interviews by people who’s blogs make Oliver Stone movies look like recorded bits of actual history.
Why would you call Larry Sinclair "crazy"?
What evidence do you have to make such a statement?
Oh, I'll never hear from you again with you providing anything to substantiate your speculation, will I Russell? You're too busy drinking the Kool - Aid.
Nobody believed what Monica Lewinsky said either, did they Russell? Until that blue dress confirmed Bill Clinton's DNA. Do you remember that Russell? She would have been labeled "crazy" too, if it hadn't been for that dress.
Well, other than the dude and the dude doing coke and having sex.
Barry will come out and admit it and then get the gay and drug addict vote. He is gooooooood.
Providing that no rescheduling takes place, we should find out sometime next week about the polygraph results from Larry Sinclair (see several posts above "Larry Sinclair Will Take Polygraph Test". And you are right. If it proves true it only means Obama will get the coke and gay voter base because he is for "change."
I'm waiting for Russy Tupper to answer my questions. But I think Russy was just a typical Lib "Drive by" commenter. They make the "hit" then they go back to mixing new batches of the Kool-Aid.
You said "Russy." Ha.
Yeah, I said "Russy." Wonder if we'll hear from him? I doubt it.
Links to this post:
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.