.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Is Karl Rove Running MoveOn?

Could it be that Karl Rove left the White House and is now overseeing the operations of MoveOn? It almost seems that this is the case considering how MoveOn hurts Democrats and helps Republicans. Maybe MoveOn's objective is to secretly help Conservatives and Republicans? More likely, MoveOn is unable to think beyond the nose on their collective face, considering their actions can come back shooting themselves in the foot.

Consider this, AP:

    The Senate voted Thursday to condemn an advertisement by the liberal anti-war group MoveOn.org that accused the top military commander in Iraq of betrayal.

    The 72-25 vote condemned the full-page ad that appeared in The New York Times last week as Gen. David Petraeus, the top military commander in Iraq, testified on Capitol Hill. The ad was headlined: "General Petraeus or General Betray Us? Cooking the books for the White House."

    The ad became a life raft for the Republican party as the war debate kicked into high gear. With several Republicans opposed to President Bush's war strategy, GOP members were able to put aside their differences and rally around their disapproval of the ad.

    Sen. Gordon Smith, one of the few Republican senators who supports legislation ordering troop withdrawals, told reporters Thursday he thought Petraeus' testimony and the MoveOn.org ad were the two biggest factors in keeping Republicans from breaking ranks with the president: Petraeus' testimony because it was persuasive and the MoveOn add because it went too far by attacking a popular uniformed officer.

    "It was stupid on their part and disgraceful," said Smith, R-Ore.

MoveOn could have had Senator Smith on their side on this vote, but they alienated him. Bravo, MoveOn, Bravo!

Twenty-five Democrats tacitly or explicitly voted their approval of MoveOn's "General BetryaUs" advertisement because they fear being attacked and condemned by MoveOn.

Instead of mobilizing Democrats, MoveOn is mobilizing and stabilizing Republicans while drawing attention to the unruly, disjointed, disorganized and fragmented Democrat Ship of Fools sailing a chaotic course whose destination is the Island of Defeat.

Hillary Clinton and Chris Dodd voted not to condemn the BetrayUs ad. It was a non-binding resolution, the kind of non-binding resolution that, in the past, were ones in which the Dems were so enamored. But not this time? How interesting. Clinton and Dodd voted the way they did - along with 23 other Democrats - because they are afraid of being attacked by MoveOn. This comes as no surprise since these Democrat White House hopefuls are afraid to appear on FOX News while talking out of the other side of their mouth claiming that "we need to talk to our enemies."

Another attempt by the Democrats failed Friday, 13 votes shy on their latest version of Cutting and Running:

    "Well, we didn't make it today, but we are going to keep trying," [Michigan Democrat Carl] Levin said Friday during a news conference.

Well Carl, keep putting lipstick on that pig.

The more vicious the attacks, the more anger displayed by MoveOn, the more cohesive and unified the Republicans become. Don't think that the Betrayus advertisement is the zenith display of MoveOns' rage. We have a full 13 months ahead of us of more wrath and dander to come from MoveOn and similar organizations.

Keep up the good work, MoveOn; the work that polarizes your own party and your own politicians.Those of us who are Republicans, Independents, Independent-Conservatives, Libertarians and Moderate Democrats owe MoveOn a debt of gratitude. MoveOn is doing the work of which Karl Rove need not concern himself.


Labels: ,

hell yea, nobody could be that stupid and straight up.
Karl Rove couldn't dream of such a massive cluster fuck as MoveOn is doing to the Dems.
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker

Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.