Wednesday, July 26, 2006
Sympathy For The Terrorists
What's wrong with those of you out there - so many of you Lefties - whose sympathy lies more with terrorists than peace-seeking countries and its people? How can you folks be so thickheaded as to identify and align yourselves with Terrorists and their supporters?
You do know, and you do realize - don't you - that 99.9% of the entire Middle East would be, and would have been, peaceful throughout the decades if only various Terrorist groups would put down their weapons and seek - as you Lefties love to say - diplomacy rather than war. You do know this, right? You do admit this, right? You don't? How can you be so blind?
The current conflict on the Israel and Lebanon border, involving Hezbollah and its supporters, wouldn't exist had Hezbollah not captured two Israeli soldiers and not taken them as hostages. No capture, no hostage, no war. It's that simple.
Had the Lebanese government agreed to do what it promised the United Nations it would do, work towards reducing Hezbollah terrorism and reigning in the terrorist elements, there wouldn't be a present day war going on in the Middle East.
Is it because Hezbollah is part of the "democratically elected" Lebanese government that inclines you Lefties into supporting Hezbollah? What if through some freak of Liberal Legislature the United States allowed, oh - I don't know - repeat sexual offenders to become a political party and they became part of our government and legislature. Or what if Child Molesters of America were a recognized political party and it was quietly condoned and acquiesced by the other political parties? Would we give those groups an Official Voice recognized by our body politic?
The best part of all is that the rest of us already know how the Left deals with "lawbreakers", depending on what laws are being broken and by whom. The Left leans towards countless allowances of rehabilitation and appeals for certain types of lawbreakers like murderers (Stanley Tookie Williams), dictators (Fidel Castro) and their politically biased selective wars (Kosovo War good, Iraq War bad).
But by god, the Lefties will not tolerate and they will use the full force of the law - and even go beyond it - when it comes to a religious group in Waco, Texas, a 5-year old Cuban boy, the fast-tracked execution of a Timothy McVeigh or demanding the hide of Augusto Pinochet.
It's amazing how quickly the Left can mobilize and stay steadfastly unified in their mindset when it comes to an Elian Gonzalez or a Branch Davidian situation. For one year the Left relentlessly continued their mantra of Elian Must Go Back To Cuba. The Left endlessly accuses the Bush Administration of not having an End Game Plan in Iraq when what was the Left's End Game Plan for Elian? For Waco? "Just do it as dirty and as quickly as you can and get it off the front page."
The Left doesn't want a country to defend itself. The Left doesn't want an individual to defend him or herself. The Left doesn't want anyone to stand up for anything - well, except for what the Left wants you to believe about them. Then it's Achtung Baby!
©2006
Linking Here:
Flopping Acres
You do know, and you do realize - don't you - that 99.9% of the entire Middle East would be, and would have been, peaceful throughout the decades if only various Terrorist groups would put down their weapons and seek - as you Lefties love to say - diplomacy rather than war. You do know this, right? You do admit this, right? You don't? How can you be so blind?
The current conflict on the Israel and Lebanon border, involving Hezbollah and its supporters, wouldn't exist had Hezbollah not captured two Israeli soldiers and not taken them as hostages. No capture, no hostage, no war. It's that simple.
Had the Lebanese government agreed to do what it promised the United Nations it would do, work towards reducing Hezbollah terrorism and reigning in the terrorist elements, there wouldn't be a present day war going on in the Middle East.
Is it because Hezbollah is part of the "democratically elected" Lebanese government that inclines you Lefties into supporting Hezbollah? What if through some freak of Liberal Legislature the United States allowed, oh - I don't know - repeat sexual offenders to become a political party and they became part of our government and legislature. Or what if Child Molesters of America were a recognized political party and it was quietly condoned and acquiesced by the other political parties? Would we give those groups an Official Voice recognized by our body politic?
The best part of all is that the rest of us already know how the Left deals with "lawbreakers", depending on what laws are being broken and by whom. The Left leans towards countless allowances of rehabilitation and appeals for certain types of lawbreakers like murderers (Stanley Tookie Williams), dictators (Fidel Castro) and their politically biased selective wars (Kosovo War good, Iraq War bad).
But by god, the Lefties will not tolerate and they will use the full force of the law - and even go beyond it - when it comes to a religious group in Waco, Texas, a 5-year old Cuban boy, the fast-tracked execution of a Timothy McVeigh or demanding the hide of Augusto Pinochet.
It's amazing how quickly the Left can mobilize and stay steadfastly unified in their mindset when it comes to an Elian Gonzalez or a Branch Davidian situation. For one year the Left relentlessly continued their mantra of Elian Must Go Back To Cuba. The Left endlessly accuses the Bush Administration of not having an End Game Plan in Iraq when what was the Left's End Game Plan for Elian? For Waco? "Just do it as dirty and as quickly as you can and get it off the front page."
The Left doesn't want a country to defend itself. The Left doesn't want an individual to defend him or herself. The Left doesn't want anyone to stand up for anything - well, except for what the Left wants you to believe about them. Then it's Achtung Baby!
©2006
Linking Here:
Flopping Acres
Alabama Internet
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.
