Wednesday, May 03, 2006
I, STADIUM Part 4: Enter "THE LIAR"
By a close vote, the Senate Rules Committee extracted the House-passed Twins proposal from the Senate Tax Committee, where the proposal had been stalled since last Thursday. Then, the Rules Committee voted 13-11 to expand it to a two-stadium Twins-Vikings bill and enact a broader geographical tax to pay for both.
The bill now awaiting floor consideration calls for a seven-county metropolitan area sales tax of a half cent on every dollar of taxable purchases. The proceeds would top $200 million a year and be used to pay the bulk of costs for new Twins and Vikings stadiums and for mass transit projects in the region. The tax would be subject to voter approval.
"We're taking it a vote at a time, a step at a time," said Senate Majority Leader Dean Johnson, DFL-Willmar.
Are you sure you don't need to pretend to consult with the State Supreme Court Justices? You sly, lying, worthless public servant!
©2006
Previous Posts on The Stadium Issue:
I, STADIUM Part 3: Failed Arguments For Taxpayer Assisted Ballparks
I, STADIUM Part 2
I, STADIUM
Minnesota Twins Stadium: Why Should Carl Pohlad Pay His Fair Share?
Labels: Carl Pohlad, I Stadium, Sid Hartman, Zygi Wilf
Alabama Internet
This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.