Friday, April 21, 2006
Al O'FrankenFailure On The Issues!
Al O'FrankenFailure: The Greatest All-Time Lying Liar of LiarDom
Can't get enough of Al O'FrankenFailure? I know I can't! City Pages, the News and Arts weekly newspaper of the Twin Cities, interviewed The O'FrankenFailure.
Some of the more interesting facets:
O'FrankenFailure shed a tear during John Kerry's 2004 concession speech. Pardon any further typos I may make from hereon, but I can't stop laughing at that. Boo-Hoo, Al, Boo-Hoo.
Question: [Are people getting] a little tired of celebrities inserting themselves into political debates and political races?
O'FrankenFailure: Well, the Republicans didn't complain when [California Governor Arnold] Schwarzenegger jumped in. And his [prior] experience was limited to taking steroids and lifting weights.
Question: What is [your] political vision?
O'FrankenFailure: It's the vision of a more just society in all respects - certainly in economic respects. Tax justice is going to be part of this [vision]. And simple things like the living wage. Fair-trade deals. Health care for everyone. Investment in our schools. Addressing the real problem, which is global warming - that's just a common sense issue and a moral issue. Renewable energy, bio-fuels. Pension reform, making sure that people have safe retirements. Addressing the stupid bankruptcy stuff. Establishing a foreign policy where we respect the views of other countries - where we make ourselves more secure by doing that.
Question: Does part of the temptation to run [for the Senate] have to do with your sense that if you don't, no one else will - at least no one who represents that vision you described?
O'FrankenFailure: Well, yeah. In 2008, I want someone to run who's gonna beat [MN Senator] Norm [Coleman]. And I want someone to run who believes in the stuff that I believe in - believes to the degree that I do [laughs].
His political vision is nothing more than regurgitated Socialism, period. Making people more "equal" by imposing tax justice? You mean like the highest tax increase this country ever had, imposed by Bill Clinton? You mean THAT kind of tax justice?
Renewable energy, bio-fuels, blah blah blah. We've been hearing this same hackneyed alternative energy propaganda since at least the Jimmy Cah-tah Crisis Presidency. And while the Left has had their opportunities to do something with that issue, they have instead, chosen to do nothing.
"Investment in our schools." Investment is a metaphor for "Increased Taxes", and nothing more. How much is enough when comes to school funding? Year after year, cities in every state pass tax increases for education. Nobody can get a legitimate copy of a school budget that is understandable to determine if the tax hike is needed or justified. Nobody knows how and where this money is being spent or where it goes, yet taxes are increased again and again "For The Children". The last vestige of a politician, or a school board, is "The Children".
Global warming...common sense? The scientific community is more divided on global warming than they are on any other issue. Maybe global warming is happening, but maybe it isn't. Maybe it's a cycle that the earth goes through every few hundred-thousand or million years. To panic at the short term, so-called, "evidence" that proponents of global warming report is to buy into a Sky Is Falling Chicken Little Syndrome. Far more studying and research - perhaps years or decades - is needed before a conclusion of definite global warming can be made.
Funny, that the Left pooh-poohs that "Iran won't have nuclear weapons for at least five years," implying there's plenty of time to do something about it, but global warming? Why, according to the Left, global warming is here and now and real and action must be taken immediately. You mean we must act now on global warming but we can just keep postponing acting on Iran? Hypocrites!
Beating Senator Norm Coleman: You just want someone, anyone, specifically a Commiecrat, to beat Norm Coleman. Their qualifications or experience don't matter (certainly they don't if you are considering running) as long as they can beat a Republican, right? That's all that matters - to elect another Socialist to the Senate. Anyone, as long as they are a Commiecrat.
I kind of hope The O'FrankenFailure does run for Senate in 2008. I think he'd be a dandy candidate. A dandy candidate for any Conservative to handily beat.
©2006
: 4:38 PM, April 21, 2006 Ah....no, not really. Thanks for the words!!
<< Home
Alabama Internet
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.
