Thursday, March 30, 2006
AirHead America: Take Two
In keeping with the Liberal Tradition that when one fledging enterprise isn't working, the answer is creating a second enterprise with the hopes that it will meander its way through the maze and aimlessly roam until, if it's lucky, find the bulls-eye, a second liberal radio network is in the works called the Head On Radio Network. (You can search for it via Google, I'm not linking to it or giving it a plug.) In other words, the AirHead America Radio Network isn't the success its creators, financial backers and on-air "talent" thought it would, planned it to be, and wanted it to be. Why would you clone a failed business model? While imitation may be the most sincere form of flattery (or ridicule), who and why would anyone want to imitate an unsuccessful operation? Why, only AA, of course!
AA has lost affiliate stations in Phoenix, Arizona, West Virginia and Missoula, Montana. Instead of facing the reality that these stations pulled in no ratings and thus, no advertising dollars, AA points the finger of blame and the failure of these stations to attract listeners onto others. They blame the free market, that these stations were sold and their programming changed to classic music, country music, and (GASP!) Christian formats. AA, instead of admitting that these stations weren't attracting an audience, blame the free market for doing what any other unprofitable business would do; changing procedure and policy, in this case format, to one that is profitable.
Once again the Left's envy of a corporation being profitable and successful rears its ugly head. But they won't apply this same standard to themselves. I doubt the on-air "talent" of AA work for free, donating their time and effort to "The Cause". Maybe Al O'FrankenFailure could take a reduction in his reported AA $2-$3 Million salary per year? Is there any wealth envy of O'FrankenFailure from his lesser know peers Randi Rhodes, The Rapidly Aging Corpse of Mike Malloy or Stephanie Miller? You bet there is!
So the strategy the Left devises to combat the effectiveness, profitability and dominance of Conservative Talk Radio is...to create a second liberal radio network? You've heard the saying that insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result each time. Insanity, thy name is Liberal Talk Radio.
©2006
AA has lost affiliate stations in Phoenix, Arizona, West Virginia and Missoula, Montana. Instead of facing the reality that these stations pulled in no ratings and thus, no advertising dollars, AA points the finger of blame and the failure of these stations to attract listeners onto others. They blame the free market, that these stations were sold and their programming changed to classic music, country music, and (GASP!) Christian formats. AA, instead of admitting that these stations weren't attracting an audience, blame the free market for doing what any other unprofitable business would do; changing procedure and policy, in this case format, to one that is profitable.
Once again the Left's envy of a corporation being profitable and successful rears its ugly head. But they won't apply this same standard to themselves. I doubt the on-air "talent" of AA work for free, donating their time and effort to "The Cause". Maybe Al O'FrankenFailure could take a reduction in his reported AA $2-$3 Million salary per year? Is there any wealth envy of O'FrankenFailure from his lesser know peers Randi Rhodes, The Rapidly Aging Corpse of Mike Malloy or Stephanie Miller? You bet there is!
So the strategy the Left devises to combat the effectiveness, profitability and dominance of Conservative Talk Radio is...to create a second liberal radio network? You've heard the saying that insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result each time. Insanity, thy name is Liberal Talk Radio.
©2006
Labels: Malloy The Rotting Corpse, Ratty Rhodes
Alabama Internet
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.
