Sunday, January 29, 2006
$ Following $ The $ Abramoff $ Money $
"Follow the money, follow the money, follow the money." Isn't it amusing that the Libs are trotting out this well worn, tattered phrase from their cobwebbed dusty playbook?
Did you see Chris Wallace grill DNC Chair Howlin' Howard Dean on Fox News Sunday this morning? Did you hear Howlin' Howard stammer and fumble when Wallace nailed him on the Democrats taking money from clients of Jack Abramoff? Howie, methinks thou dost protest too much. Much too much too much.
Hmmmmm... "Nobody got anything out of the Democrats from Jack Abramoff. "
Well, then if what Howlin' Howie said is accurate, if the money MrsSatan received from Abramoff clients was not an issue, why would MrsSatan spokesman Ann Lewis take such great lengths to issue the statement that that money would be donated to charities? Ann, methinks thou dost protest too much.
How many years have the LiberNazi's told "the American people" to "Follow the money"? Well, you see, that's what we're doing. We're following the money. We're following the money that is connected to Democrats that is traceable back to Jack Abramoff. Whether the money is from an Abramoff client, donor, or group that has, in any way, accepted Abramoff money and has laundered it through their Whirlpool and channeled it back to a Democrat. Like Harry Reid for example. And the above mentioned MrsSatan/Abramoff money that Ann Lewis needs to make sure that the media is aware has been donated to charity.
For years the Libs have been unable to raise the amount of money that the Republicans can raise. The Libs fundraising efforts pale in comparison to what the Conservatives can raise. Instead of trying harder to meet or exceed what the Republicans can fundraise, the Libs want to change the rules of fundraising, hence McCain-Feingold.
Now, since McCain-Feingold didn't level the playing field for the Libs, they want to change the rules yet again. It's sort of like saying that I want to play in the PGA Desert Classic, but since I'm not as good a golfer as the pro's are, they cannot play to the best of their ability. Since they're better golfers than am I, they have to hold back on their expertise and ability in order to give me a chance at winning the Desert Classic.
This is just so typical of the Liberal mentality, to cry and whine, and want to change the rules and guidelines when they can't compete within those rules and guidelines.
The most recent rule change the Libs tout is to fund campaigns with public money and eliminate private money. Yeah, that will really work. It's not enough that the Liberals have both of their slimy greasy hands in all my pockets; now they want me to fund their campaigns. I think not.
And with regard to his proposed "100 Days" (again, from Fox News Sunday):
This is what it comes down to: If the Libs' fundraising exceeded what the Conservatives raised, year after year, and the Conservatives were crying for campaign finance reform, the response from the Libs would be, "oh quit your crying, you're just jealous that you're unable to raise as much money as we are."
Well, that's exactly the response I have to all you crybaby Libs out there. You can't raise as much as your opponents? Too bad. You want to change the rules? Not going to happen.
I will pitch in for an industrial sized box of kleenex for you crybaby Libs. But it's going to be the generic tissue, not the sleek, smooth, lotion-soaked type. And if you don't like that, then that's too damned bad. Use grade 16 sandpaper instead,then.
Quit your crying, put on you big boy pants and get out there and hustle for the money yourselves. You think you deserve it? Go work for it and earn it, just like everyone else has to do.
Oh, and by the way, for all you LiberNazi's out there: EARN: 1. To merit or deserve, as by labor or service; to do that which entitles one to (a reward, whether the reward is received or not). The high repute Which he through hazard huge must earn. 2. To acquire by labor, service, or performance; to deserve and receive as compensation or wages; as, to earn a good living; to earn honors or laurels.
It's the opposite of "Gimme", and I know you Libs know the meaning of that word.
©2006
Did you see Chris Wallace grill DNC Chair Howlin' Howard Dean on Fox News Sunday this morning? Did you hear Howlin' Howard stammer and fumble when Wallace nailed him on the Democrats taking money from clients of Jack Abramoff? Howie, methinks thou dost protest too much. Much too much too much.
- DEAN: There's two points to this. First of all, actually, we - the DNC actually got $100,000-some odd. Now, I can assure you Jack Abramoff never directed that money. It is possible that some of Jack Abramoff's clients may have decided on their own to give Democrats money. The key is...
WALLACE: I'm sorry, did you say, I'm sorry. Did you say that you're sure that Abramoff didn't direct them to give that money?
DEAN: No, what I said was that it is possible that some Democrats got money from some of the - yeah. No, what I'm saying is that Abramoff may not have directed some of this money toward the Democrats.
WALLACE: In fact, he did, sir. We've got evidence of that.
DEAN: But the point is that not one Democrat either knew it or acted on it. Nobody got anything out of the Democrats from Jack Abramoff. No Democrat delivered anything, and there's no accusation and no investigation that any Democrat ever delivered anything to Jack Abramoff. And that's not true of the Republican.
First he can assure us Abramoff NEVER directed that money: "I can assure you Jack Abramoff never directed that money."
Then the Spin: "...what I'm saying is that Abramoff MAY NOT have directed some of this money...": "No, what I said was that it is possible that some Democrats got money from some of the - yeah. No, what I'm saying is that Abramoff may not have directed some of this money toward the Democrats."
Then the Spin: "...what I'm saying is that Abramoff MAY NOT have directed some of this money...": "No, what I said was that it is possible that some Democrats got money from some of the - yeah. No, what I'm saying is that Abramoff may not have directed some of this money toward the Democrats."
Hmmmmm... "Nobody got anything out of the Democrats from Jack Abramoff. "
Well, then if what Howlin' Howie said is accurate, if the money MrsSatan received from Abramoff clients was not an issue, why would MrsSatan spokesman Ann Lewis take such great lengths to issue the statement that that money would be donated to charities? Ann, methinks thou dost protest too much.
How many years have the LiberNazi's told "the American people" to "Follow the money"? Well, you see, that's what we're doing. We're following the money. We're following the money that is connected to Democrats that is traceable back to Jack Abramoff. Whether the money is from an Abramoff client, donor, or group that has, in any way, accepted Abramoff money and has laundered it through their Whirlpool and channeled it back to a Democrat. Like Harry Reid for example. And the above mentioned MrsSatan/Abramoff money that Ann Lewis needs to make sure that the media is aware has been donated to charity.
For years the Libs have been unable to raise the amount of money that the Republicans can raise. The Libs fundraising efforts pale in comparison to what the Conservatives can raise. Instead of trying harder to meet or exceed what the Republicans can fundraise, the Libs want to change the rules of fundraising, hence McCain-Feingold.
Now, since McCain-Feingold didn't level the playing field for the Libs, they want to change the rules yet again. It's sort of like saying that I want to play in the PGA Desert Classic, but since I'm not as good a golfer as the pro's are, they cannot play to the best of their ability. Since they're better golfers than am I, they have to hold back on their expertise and ability in order to give me a chance at winning the Desert Classic.
This is just so typical of the Liberal mentality, to cry and whine, and want to change the rules and guidelines when they can't compete within those rules and guidelines.
The most recent rule change the Libs tout is to fund campaigns with public money and eliminate private money. Yeah, that will really work. It's not enough that the Liberals have both of their slimy greasy hands in all my pockets; now they want me to fund their campaigns. I think not.
And with regard to his proposed "100 Days" (again, from Fox News Sunday):
DEAN: That's a big problem, and those Democrats are in trouble, and they should be in trouble. And our party, if the American people will put us back in power in '06, we will have on the president's desk things that outlaw all those kinds of behaviors. Right now it's a Republican scandal. Maybe they'll find that some Democrats did something wrong, too. That hasn't been the case yet.
But our reforms in the Democratic Party are going to be aimed at both Democrats and Republicans. We want to clean up Congress, and we will within 100 days of the new Congress in 2007.
This is what it comes down to: If the Libs' fundraising exceeded what the Conservatives raised, year after year, and the Conservatives were crying for campaign finance reform, the response from the Libs would be, "oh quit your crying, you're just jealous that you're unable to raise as much money as we are."
Well, that's exactly the response I have to all you crybaby Libs out there. You can't raise as much as your opponents? Too bad. You want to change the rules? Not going to happen.
I will pitch in for an industrial sized box of kleenex for you crybaby Libs. But it's going to be the generic tissue, not the sleek, smooth, lotion-soaked type. And if you don't like that, then that's too damned bad. Use grade 16 sandpaper instead,then.
Quit your crying, put on you big boy pants and get out there and hustle for the money yourselves. You think you deserve it? Go work for it and earn it, just like everyone else has to do.
Oh, and by the way, for all you LiberNazi's out there: EARN: 1. To merit or deserve, as by labor or service; to do that which entitles one to (a reward, whether the reward is received or not). The high repute Which he through hazard huge must earn. 2. To acquire by labor, service, or performance; to deserve and receive as compensation or wages; as, to earn a good living; to earn honors or laurels.
It's the opposite of "Gimme", and I know you Libs know the meaning of that word.
©2006
Alabama Internet
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.
