Thursday, July 21, 2005
Islamofascist Cowards Attack London Again
When I first heard the news this morning about London, initially, I thought it was a follow-up story to what happened two weeks ago. But no, sadly, the cowardly bastards struck again. I am SICK of this sh*t. I've had it. I have no problem or issue with the U.S. or the U.K, or any of our allies, should they choose to begin lobbing Tactical Nuclear Weapons into the "sacred cities" of Islam. F*ck 'em, destroy them, obliterate them. Collateral damage? Yep, there will be collateral damage. Innocents will be killed, that is the price of the war that they started. Too damned bad. For those fools, the idiots on the Left, the myopic, granular pea-sized brain individuals who will try to put the blame on President Bush and Prime Minister Blair, who will try to put the blame on the United States, I am re-running the Terror Timeline written by T. James Edwards first published on this site July 9:
London Bombings: Who Is Responsible?
We are beginning to hear the usual claptrap about Bush's aggressive wars in Afghanistan and Iraq being responsible for European bombings. This is a muddled stretch of the Bush-hating imagination, and here's why:1984: (17 years before Bush): Muslims bombed US embassy in Beirut, Lebanon
1985: (16 years before Bush): Muslims bombed restaurant in Madrid, Spain; Muslims hijacked TWA flight 847 en route from Athens to Rome; Muslims hijacked cruise ship Achille Lauro; Muslims bombed airports in Rome and Vienna
1986: (15 years before Bush): Muslims bombed TWA flight 840 en route from Rome to Athens; Muslims bombed a disco in Berlin
1988: (13 years before Bush): Muslims bombed passenger jet above Lockerbie, Scotland
1993: (eight years before Bush): Muslims bombed the World Trade Center
1995: (six years before Bush): Muslims bombed Paris subway
1996: (five years before Bush): Muslims bombed barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
1998: (three years before Bush): Muslims bombed embassies in Kenya and Tanzania
2000: (one year before Bush): Muslims bombed the USS Cole in Yemen
This list above is hardly complete. It begins well before 1984, and continues through this day. Doubtless, it will keep going into the future. To get a complete picture of terrorism, visit the Terrorism Knowledge Base, one of the word's largest and most comprehensive databases chronicling the cruel deaths of innocent people.
The fact is, for more than 30 years, Muslims (the extreme variety) have deemed it acceptable and somehow productive to slaughter innocents as they travel to and from work, to shopping malls, and while sipping espresso at sidewalk cafes. Their cowardice has killed women, children, Muslims, Jews, Christians, Americans, Italians, French -- you know the drill. Characterizing this very old menace as something Bush is responsible for is an absurdity Anton Chekhov would fully appreciate. Bush is the first world leader to fight back in earnest, and that's why he twice earned my vote. Bill Clinton's errant guided missiles and full retreat from Mogadishu only resulted in an environment making 9/11 possible. And the puzzling responses to terrorism partially explains John Kerry's defeat.
The big question for American liberals and worldwide Bush-haters: Is it never okay for us to fight back?
And a suggestion for the same crowd: Review the list above, browse the Terrorism Knowledge Base, and then couch your irrational hatred of Bush. It's misplaced, and it's getting old.
And there is This item from Mens Daily News.com, by Tom Purcell from July 7, 2005:
An Open Letter to Our Islamofascist Buddies
I understand your confusion. You've probably been misunderstanding some of the messages that have been reported on the news -- those in which some American 'leaders' have stopped attacking the terrorists and instead attacked their president, who is unflinching in his efforts to defeat you.
But what you keep forgetting is that America is a free country. Anyone here is free to speak his or her mind. People can say anything even if it isn't true or even if it is intended to twist or confuse. And some of our 'leaders' have been doing just that. They hope to weaken the president with the hopes of winning back political power.
I can see how you could misunderstand that. The irony is that the best thing you could have done was to have NOT launched another attack. If you wanted to weaken our resolve to defeat you, you could have just sat back while America argued with itself, while we forgot how barbaric you really are.
But you blew it again.
This latest bombing reminds us of the way you beheaded Nick Berg, a fun-loving American fellow who did nothing to wrong you, and how you praised your God while you murdered him.
It reminds us of the way you took over a school in Chechnya, killing innocent children. And how you blew up the trains just before the Spanish elections. And how you've detonated bombs all over the world on numerous occasions with the hopes of spreading fear and terror, and how you killed thousands in America on 9/11.
This last act in London was just as horrific as your past work. I read the reports of walls covered with blood, of body parts spread about the twisted steel. That is your signature, isn't it. Well it's a dumb signature.
The truth of the matter is that you fellows aren't very smart. You had a nice host country in Afghanistan -- you were free to train terrorists and foment your hatred -- but then you attacked America on 9/11. You expected us to cower, but you got the opposite. You've been on the run ever since.
And just as America was turning on itself -- just as Democratic senators and others have had some success clouding what the war on terror is really about and making Bush and the Republicans the bad guys -- you go and strike again, which has caused America to come back to its senses again.
I think it is because you are a bunch of narcissists. You suffer from the worst of human sin and weakness, while wrapping yourselves in the cloak of your religion. You are so lost in yourselves, you actually believe God is on your side as you slaughter the innocent.
That is why you keep miscalculating, you nitwits, and thanks to your miscalculations, you have strengthened our resolve just when we needed a jolt.
That's why it's not going to work, boys.
--------------
With all respect for Mr. Purcell and his fine article, I only have two comments: One: They are not our buddies. They are the lowest form of life on earth. Despicable bastards who deserve to burn in hell, as I'm sure they will. Two: 'Nitwits' is too kind a word Mr. Purcell. Again, they are bastards practicing murder in the name of their religion.
It's time to end this bullsh*t; this jihad of terrorism in the name of Allah. TNC them, TNC their cities, their people, and yes, their children as well. Because their children are being taught to hate us, to hate countries that believe in freedom and that believe in a justice system of innocence until proven guilty. They do not afford the courtesy of being presumed innocent.
They have started something that must be ended, and ended quickly and painfully. They are a malignant cancer that must be immediately sliced off the face of the earth.
They must be removed from the earth. Not jailed, not brought to trial, not dealt with in the scenario of world courts. We must respond in kind, for that is the only response they will understand. With TNC's.
We stand with you and by your side, London. We stand by and with our allies. It's time to take them "out" and remove these bastards from the planet. Period! End of story.
©2005
Labels: Islamic Terrorism
Alabama Internet
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.
