Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Sonia Sotomayor: Affirmative Action Justice
On Tuesday, Dear Leader His Excellency Pbama picked Sonia Sotomayor to replace David Souter on the Supreme Court.
My god, people, we can't have an Affirmative Action Spic on the Supreme Court! Hell, The Left said we couldn't have a Spic as Attorney General with Alberto Gonzales, so how could we possibly have a Spic on the Supreme Court?
And ugly! Anal-hemorrhoid-ass ugly this Sonia Sotomayor is! She didn't get where she is because of her looks, no, it was all on Affirmative Action, baby, all Affirmative Action. And you know it!
sexually harassed because...well...just look at her!
Look, Bolognamayor got where she is because of Affirmative Action. She is not an intellectual giant by any means and she is quite the reverse racist. From The NYT:
In 2001, Sonia Sotomayor, an appeals court judge, gave a speech declaring that the ethnicity and sex of a judge “may and will make a difference in our judging.”
In her speech, Judge Sotomayor questioned the famous notion — often invoked by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her retired Supreme Court colleague, Sandra Day O’Connor — that a wise old man and a wise old woman would reach the same conclusion when deciding cases.
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor, who is now considered to be near the top of President Obama’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees.
Her remarks, at the annual Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California, Berkeley, were not the only instance in which she has publicly described her view of judging in terms that could provoke sharp questioning in a confirmation hearing.
This month, for example, a video surfaced of Judge Sotomayor asserting in 2005 that a “court of appeals is where policy is made.” She then immediately adds: “And I know — I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law. I know. O.K. I know. I’m not promoting it. I’m not advocating it. I’m — you know.”
* "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life."
What in the hell does that mean? The law is the law.
Remember, for the past eight years one of the mainstay platitudes we heard from The Left is, "The Rule of Law...The Rule of Law." Well then, the Rule of Law is blind to gender, sex, age, ethnicity and just about everything else under the sun. But not with Sonia Bolognamayor. She says a female Spic can reach a conclusion better than a white male and a white woman. What a prejudiced cunt.
The uber-Liberal sites such as Media Matters and The HuffPuffPoo (no, I'm not linking to them) are desperately trying to spin Sotomayor's comment of "court of appeals is where policy is made," into something that is being misrepresented or exploited. Gee, The Left never misrepresents or exploits anything or any one, do they?
The thing is, her comment on the court of appeals is where policy is made is NOT being taken out of context or misrepresented by her critics.
If there was nothing wrong with her comment, why did she add to it, “And I know — I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law. I know. O.K. I know. I’m not promoting it. I’m not advocating it. I’m — you know.”
She knew her words are not in step with how the judicial branch of our country is supposed to work. That it has been hi-jacked by judicial activism - the kind embraced and promoted by this Affirmative Action Spic - is obvious, which is why she said what she said.
She also made a law firm apologize for what she BELIEVED were discriminatory words. What a fucking thin-skinned cunt.
Awwwww...Sotocunt says reading Nancy Drew mysteries are what influenced her to go into law. Isn't that precious? Uh, wait, it's not...it's fucking stupid. What a dumb bitch. And The Left poked fun of W. Bush reading "My Pet Goat" and we have a Supreme Court nominee who says it was Nancy Drew that influenced her to go into law? What douche bag Sotocunt is.
Nancy Drew And The Mysterious Affirmative Action SCOTUS Nominee
"But Dave, but Dave," the Pillow Biting Pbama Cultists retort, "it was President George H. W. Bush who first appointed her." Yeah, as a FAVOR to the late Dan Moynihan. The Examiner:
Just why did the first President Bush nominate Sotomayor to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York? The answer, after discussing the issue with veterans of the first Bush administration, is pure politics, with a generous helping of horse-trading thrown in.
The first thing you have to understand is how judges are nominated to the federal district courts, which are below the circuit courts of appeal and the Supreme Court. The higher courts are often the stage for ideologically-based confirmation fights. The lower district courts, are, in the words of one former Bush official, "darn near patronage jobs."
...in 1991, when Sotomayor was nominated, the Senate was controlled by Democrats, and the two senators from New York were Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Republican Alphonse D'Amato.
By a number of accounts, Moynihan and D'Amato had a longstanding arrangement. "It was a special deal whereby D'Amato agreed to defer to the pick of Moynihan for one out of every four district court seats," another former Bush official told me. "That was a deal that preceded President Bush I, so basically Moynihan was picking one of four district court nominees." That deal stood even though Republicans controlled the White House and thus (theoretically) the right to choose judges for the federal courts.
And at that moment, in 1991, it was Moynihan's turn to choose, and his choice was Sotomayor. There is no evidence that anyone in the Bush I White House or Justice Department thought Sotomayor was a conservative, or even a moderate, but no one wanted a fight with Moynihan. "She was not our first choice," recalls a third Bush I official, "but she was someone who was, if we were going to get a nominee confirmed to that position -- essentially someone we had to go with."
Sotomayor is woefully unqualified and inexperienced to sit on the Supreme Court. Just as woefully unqualified and inexperienced as is Hussein Pbama Junior to sit in the White House. And THAT is why he picked her.
Senate Republicans should vote en masse against her nomination. Republicans should block and attempt to obstruct every single appointment and law that Pbama and his Marxist Congress want to pass over the next three-and-one-half years. But don't bet the farm that Republicans will do the right thing in opposing Sotocunt. I'm sure the Moderates and RINOs will be only too eager to confirm her. And this is what separates the Moderates and RINOs from the true Conservatives.
President Neophyte Affirmative Action Obango Hussein Junior, the kenyan man currently living in the White House for free, is paving the way for marxism.
George Soros, Jeremiah Wright (I won't call him "Reverend since he is not") and Bill "Guilty as Hell" Ayers must be rubbing their socialist hands.
"Slum Princess." ILOVEIT!
I have to agree on Soros. I think he is the ultimate Puppet Master of Obama and the current Liberal majority congress. His version of America is to turn it into a socialist hellhole.
"And how much longer will average Americans accept Supreme Court Appointments of someone like Sonia Sotomayor, who is a self admitted pro-feminist racist, anti-White in terms of equal opportunity, and a judicial activist who thinks her instincts can replace the Constitution?"
Enough said, I rest my case.
Good stuff. The thing is, I don't think average Americans want Sotomayor on the SCOTUS. But the vocal, loud minority of Liberals are the whiners and crybabies and too many people (not me) are inclined to stick a titty in their mouths just to shut them up.
My solution? Off with their heads!
I'm behind you 100% on that, but I do think it detracts from your post to call her a spic. That's something the socialists and "progressives" will cite as "proof" that her opponents are simply rednecks and racists.
There are more than enough legitimate complaints to make about this cunt, her statements, her judicial record and her view of the world without having to resort to calling her a spic. And personally I don't have a problem with her race -- I have a problem that she was nominated BECAUSE of her race, and that she thinks she's more qualified to render decisions BECAUSE of her race.
So please, while we can call her a stupid fucking racist cunt (because she is), let's chill out on the racial epithets and concentrate on the wealth of reasons why she would be poisonous as a Supreme Court justice in this country.
And for the rest of you, be glad you don't live in New York and have to see that fuckface Schmucky Schumer on TV constantly.
Molson, I know you're trying to throw the identity politics right back at the Left for saying Schumer "is white and as such is not qualified," but you have to understand that to the Left, Jewish people aren't white -- they're allowed to count themselves among the minority population, for who knows what fucking reason, which is why you'll see dozens of Jewish writers on sights like Fuckington Post and AlterNet spewing racist hate about non-minorities, but brazenly counting themselves among the protected minorities in this country.
What a fucked up direction we're going in with the Democrats running things
I agree with you completely that she was nominated for her minority status and (after what I read today) her staunch anti-Second Amendment views.
Regarding calling her a "spic": I used that word solely for hyperbole and absurdity, illustrating what and how The Left treats their opponents. It is intended to be over-the-top - for shock effect - in such a way that no one should conclude that I meant it in a serious way or that I would hold her ethnicity against her, which I do not.
I don't have a problem with her race, gender or anything else personal about her.
I do have problems with her lack of qualifications, her inexperience and her Affirmative Action status.
I noticed you said that you didn't think Sotomayor was an intellectual giant, so how you respond to the fact she attended Princeton and Yale? And that she graduated suma cum laude? If affirmative action got her into Princeton, are you saying that it also handed her a 3.8 grade point average?
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.