.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sunday, April 06, 2008

Obama Is All Pro Gun Control

Osama Hussein Obama Ted Kennedy's Poodle is all for gun control. He wants to take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Others who have done this in history have been labeled Fascists. One person who did this was named Adolf. His last name started with an "H"...it's on the tip of my tongue but I can't think of it...maybe it will come to me.

Obama is against law-abiding citizens without any criminal record or history being able to defend themselves. Townhall:

    Barack Obama is embracing anti-gun policies in the run-up to a Democratic presidential debate scheduled on the one-year anniversary of the Virginia Tech shootings.

    “I am not in favor of concealed weapons,” Obama told the Pittsburgh Tribune. "I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations." [Yes, it would have been just terrible had a law-abiding citizen been carrying a concealed weapon to defend and protect him or herself - let alone others - at V-Tech, wouldn't it? - Drake]

    These remarks break from Obama’s previous moderate rhetoric on gun control.

    While campaigning in Idaho in February, Obama promised, “I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.”

Why - is The Poodle flip-flopping on his words? It sure seems so.

Again from the above Townhall story:

    [Obama said], "a lot of law-abiding citizens use it for hunting, for sportsmanship, and for protecting their families."

I'm really sick and tired of Democrats using hunting and sportsmanship as their faux argument in pretending and posturing to be pro-Second Amendment. Hunting and sportsmanship have nothing to do with the Second Amendment.

From Politico:

    ...Obama is engaging in a quiet, but targeted drive to win over an important constituency that on the surface might seem hostile to his views.

    The need to craft a strategy aimed at pro-gun voters underscores the potency of the issue in Pennsylvania, which claims one of the nation’s highest per capita membership rates in the National Rifle Association.


    “Guns are a cultural lens through which they view candidates,” said Jim Kessler, vice president for policy at Third Way, a progressive think tank. “If you are seen as way off on that issue, then you seem way off on everything. If you are seen as OK, if the lens is clearer, then they continue to look at you and size you up on other things.”

    “For Obama, who is less known and is from Chicago, a city guy and an African American, the feeling is that he is anti-gun,” Kessler continued. “By handling the Second Amendment correctly, he starts to get a hearing among these folks.”


    Obama has long backed gun-control measures, including a ban on semiautomatic weapons and concealed weapons, and a limit on handgun purchases to one a month.


    A two-page white paper on Obama’s website doesn’t mention his voting record. [Gee, I wonder why? Could it be because his voting record is solidly pro gun-control? - Drake]


    “He will protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport, and use guns for the purposes of hunting and target shooting,” the paper states. “He also believes that the right is subject to reasonable and common sense regulation.”

There is no such thing as a Liberal or Progressive believing in "reasonable and common sense regulation" of guns. The only thing they believe in is the confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens.

It's okay to be a criminal and carry a gun. But don't even think about being a law-abiding citizen carrying a legally concealed gun to defend and protect yourself. You're a criminal if you do; at least in the eyes of Liberals like Obama.

He is faking out anyone who believes in the Second Amendment with his rhetoric. Don't fall for this act, Pennsylvania voters - he's pulling the wool over your eyes big time. BIG TIME!


Definitely not something to be taken lightly, but reading "A two-page white paper on Obama’s website doesn’t mention his voting record..." had me wondering: Is this a typical white paper?
I haven't trusted that s.o.b. since the beginning.

It's amazing to me how many times liberal Democrats flip flop on the issues, depending on their political situation.
T1G: heh, a white paper written with white ink, perhaps?

"Why it's a blank two pieces of paper." From the sounds of it, it may as well be.

Take care T1G. Thanks for visiting!
Braden, you and I and others apparently just haven't drunk the Kool Aid. If we did, why...we'd be Obamazombies too!

I can't beleive the free pass this guy gets on every frikkin issue. It's amazing. What do you think?
Post a Comment

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker

Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.