.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sunday, October 26, 2008

al-Qaida Never Endorsed McCain;
But Iran Did Endorse Obama

I have to hand it to the Insane Liberal Clown Posse of the blogosphere. They never wait for facts, no, they just jump on the latest unconfirmed rumor and act like it's the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. It's what I've always said, Liberals never allow what they believe to be influenced by facts.

The latest smear job from The Obama Cultists and the ILCP is that al-Qaida endorsed Republican Presidential Candidate John McCain. Nothing could be more fictitious. From Blogger News Net:

    It’s a bit shocking, really, that the Washington Post rushed to print an alleged endorsement of John McCain by Al Qaeda. Missing was any verification by authorities that it was authored by anyone in command of any of its tawdry, misanthropic, holier-than-thou, spiritually moronic band of woman-beating, bombing and beheading throwbacks. One wonders what the motive of the Washington Post could have been to act (again) as the mouthpiece for terrorists without any fact-checking, a term that has apparently been erased from its editors’ lexicon. It apparently doesn’t occur to them that it’s possibly not to provide free advertisement for them. Apparently, all one has to do to effect instantaneous worldwide publication of one’s opinion – and influence a Presidential election in the United States – is claim to be Al Qaeda and endorse a candidate. Not only that, but then the Leftist press in America will pick it up and circulate it as truth.

The alleged "endorsement" reported by The Washington Post is not an official statement by al-Qaeda’s media arm, al-Sahab. In fact it is little more than [someone named] “Ahmed from Amman” [posting on a web site].

Someone who may not even exist posts an anti-McCain sentiment on a a web site and the Libs and the Cultists glom onto it as the truth. That's funny! These people believe anything but the facts.


See, Obama's not a Muslim. All Christians dress like this!

Meanwhile, The Affirmative Action Candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, Junior, is officially endorsed by Iranian parliament Speaker Ali Larijani. Ynet:

    Iranian parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said Wednesday that Iran would prefer Democrat Barack Obama in the White House next year. Larijani also dismissed any idea that the US would attack Iran.

    "We are leaning more in favor of Barack Obama because he is more flexible and rational, even though we know American policy will not change that much," Larijani said at a press conference during a visit to Bahrain.

See the difference, you blind, obedient, Kool-Aid drinking Pied Piper Obama Cultists? Larijani is an actual, living, breathing human being who is the Iranian parliament speaker. He exists, unlike Ahmed from Amman who, for all we know, is Michelle Pickles Obama The Angry, America-hating Dangerous Washerwoman, posting on a pro-al Qaida site as Ahmed from Amman.


Pickles Obama, until recently, never proud of her country.

Try again Cultists, try again. Another one of your rumors and lies shot down by three seconds worth of fact-checking. Bwa ha ha ha ha! No wonder Americans are sick and tired of your hatred and lies. You're a pox on America and the planet!


©2008

Labels: , , , , ,


Comments:
Newspaper Endorsement Tally--
Obama Leads 145-55
LANDSLIDE FOR OBAMA

THIS is the MOST unreported story of the campaign.
It means
a LANDSLIDE FOR OBAMA

Compared to THIS
Polls mean nothing.
 
Your comment has nothing to do with the subject of the post. That's okay, Obama Cultists have a hard time staying on point and focus.

Yours is the silliest comment I've read this year, so give yourself a pat on the back for that.

Take a gander at how wrong you are:

You're basing who will win on newspaper endorsements? You haven't done your homework at all, missy!

year
candidate (followed by # of verified newspaper endorsements)

1948
Dewey 771
Truman 182
(Dewey lost)

1960
Nixon 731
Kennedy 208
(Nixon lost)

1976
Ford 411
Carter 80
(Ford lost)

1996
Dole 122
Clinton 80
(Dole lost)

There's many more where the candidate getting more endorsements lost.

Source:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003877229

Now, don't you feel stupid? Okay, maybe not stupid, but uninformed?
 
That is good info
Where did you get it?
Send me the Link.

LVKen7 at Gmail dot com

I get the current endorsements from Editor and Publisher Magazine.
Thanks
 
I already posted the link.

See URL following the word SOURCE in my initial reply comment to you above.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker



Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.