.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Obama Speech Phony And Unapologetic


Just Say No To Obama


On Tuesday, March 18, 2008, Osama Hussein Obama Ted Kennedy's Poodle gave a speech in Philadelphia, PA, addressing the ongoing controversial racist and anti-American comments made by his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ.

In the eye of this storm, it is only too ironic and not perplexing that Rev. Wright has fled the country - avoiding media scrutiny - by coincidentally taking a trip to Africa. What's the matter, Rev., afraid of being scrutinized now, when in the past you've basked in the limelight?

Everyone is writing about this speech so I will try to keep this as short as possible.

What stands out the most - I think - in his speech is the following, when Obama compares Wright's statements to something said by his grandmother:

    "I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe."

It is intriguing that the words of his grandmother - his white grandmother, mind you - made him "cringe." But after attending mass and listening to 20 year's worth of Wright's sermons he never "cringed." Where Obama instantly recognized language or stereotypes made by his grandmother that made him "cringe", he sat in his pew in church for 20 years and never "cringed" at anything he heard from a Wright sermon. Well, not until the media began investigating and reporting on the content of the sermons.

Is there anything really that wrong with what his grandmother said, when in 1993, Rev. Jesse Jackson said basically THE SAME THING? The Atlantic:

    "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery -- then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."

It certainly didn't take Obama long (far less than 20 years) to reach the conclusion that Radio talker Don Imus should be fired for his remarks calling Rutgers University women's basketball players "nappy headed hos". ABC News:

    In an interview with ABC News [on July 11, 2007] Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., called for the firing of talk radio host Don Imus. Obama said he would never again appear on Imus' show, which is broadcast on CBS Radio and MSNBC television.

    "I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus," Obama told ABC News, "but I would also say that there's nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude."

    [...]

    "[Imus] didn't just cross the line," Obama said. "He fed into some of the worst stereotypes that my two young daughters are having to deal with today in America."

Gee Osama, you mean perhaps like when Rev. Wright called America the, "U.S. of KKK A” ? Do you mean that kind of stereotyping? Please explain.

It apparently is okay with Obama for his daughter's to hear sermons in church about how evil America is and how America created the AIDS virus in order to kill black people. But it's not okay for his daughters to be exposed to Don Imus' words?

Wright's sermons that we've heard over the past week are incendiary, racist, anti-American, divisive, race-baiting and exploitative. Yet not until the Media focused in on this issue did Obama "cringe" in reaction to anything preached by Wright. Obama's posing on this is as phony as can be.



This issue is not about free speech. It's not about Wright's words. He's entitled to preach hatred and racism and anti-Americanism under the First Amendment.

This issue is about Obama tacitly or explicitly approving and agreeing with Wright's message and then feigning otherwise when pressed and questioned on it. This issue is about Obama's claim to be "unfamiliar" with some of Wright's sermons when we know he was fully aware of them. This issue is about a desperate spin by Obama to keep from sinking further in the polls. None of Obama's spin will help him. His presidential campaign - at least for 2008 - is done. Stick a fork in it.

Obama waited too long in denouncing and condemning Wright's sermons.

Why didn't Obama take questions from the press after his speech?

Does Obama believe that the U.S. is really, as Wright stated, "the U.S. of KKK A"?

Obama is disingenuous.

Columnist Richard Cohen - a true "Liberals' Liberal", a guy who is to the Left of the DailyKooksKrowd - in a column at the Washington Post, asks:

    Why did Barack Obama take so long to "reject outright" the harshly critical statements about America made by his minister, Jeremiah Wright, not to mention the praise the same minister lavished on Louis Farrakhan just last November?

    How is it possible that Obama did not know about these remarks, when he is a member of Wright's congregation and so close to the man that he likens him to "an old uncle"?

The above questions are not from any Conservative Talker or Blogger...they are from Mr. Cohen who is as Liberal and Progressive as one can get.

In his Tuesday speech, Obama offered no apology, no admission of a lapse of judgment, no admission of regret or remorse and said nothing of being disappointed with Wright's sermons. The only conclusion to draw is that for 20 years Obama supported and believed in the sermons and messages he heard from Rev. Wright. It is when the content and the context of these sermons were exposed by the media that Obama became concerned and tried to cosmetically pretend to disagree with Wright's sermons and words. This, my friends, is called "posturing".

The issue of Obama and Wright is not going away anytime soon, nor should it.

Good thing Obama isn't a Mormon. If he was, he would have long ago joined Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Mike Gravel and other losing Democrat presidential contenders, joining them on the sideline.



©2008

Labels: , ,


Comments:
Overheard at the hater poodle's little church of hate...

Let us now bow our heads and hate.
 
That's a great line. I wish I would have thought of it!

You gotta start a second blog and cover politics my friend. You have too many great insights not to.
 
A second blog? Me? I'm only good at snarky comments... Sometimes. My writing abilities are suspect at best. I simply couldn't manage a blog the way you do. I need someone with a stick to poke my beer addled brain to get it to spit a few nuggets of this and that. That is why my blog is just photos. If I ever did start a second blog, it would be purely random without any focus or form. It would also probably suck, but let me think about it a little more.
 
Molson, you would rock and roll writing a political blog. You have so many great ideas, come up with so many double entendres and a creative ability to come up with names that I envy it. If you do, lemme know so I can adds ya to the blogroll.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker



Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.