.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Berkeley Back-Stepping On Ousting Marines

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates

A brief recap:
Last week Berkeley, California Mayor and a majority of its city council voted to kick the U.S. Marine recruiting office - which the mayor and council, in a letter, referred to as "uninvited" and "intruders" - out of the city.

Now, it appears Mayor Tom Bates and others are backtracking with a kinder, gentler anti-Military approach. NBC11:

    At their Tuesday council meeting, leaders will discuss scrapping a letter that might be perceived as targeting the center or the Marines.

    The letter said that the recruiting center was not welcome on Shattuck Avenue and that the Marines were uninvited and unwelcome intruders.


    "That letter will probably be pulled back and maybe more moderate language will be put in place which is appropriate I think," said Berkeley mayor Tom Bates.


    Bates said the city didn't mean to offend anyone in the armed forces and the focus should have been on the war not the troops.

    Councilmembers have said they would replace the "intruder item" with words expressing their support for the troops but not the war in Iraq.


    Code Pink announced they would have what they called a "24-hour peace-in" leading up to Tuesday's city council meeting. They will be camping out but will have a lot of company. A group of pro-troop protesters will also be there.

    "I was under the impression that we have the right of free speech," said Xanne Joi of Code Pink. "To me, I thought free speech meant you get to say what you want without recrimination."

Oh, you have free speech, Xanne. But your group doesn't seem to want it extended to anyone or any group that has a view that is different from yours. And 'Xanne' - what is that? Did you throw some consonants and a vowel into a blender and hit the purée button for 60 second?

As for Bates..."the city didn't mean to offend anyone in the armed forces..."

You called them INTRUDERS, asshat. Were you not familiar with that term or its definition last week?

Republicans are fighting back at Berkeley with a bill that would eliminate funding for UC Berkeley. FOX Reno:

    A small band of GOP lawmakers is fighting back with legislation that could eliminate millions of dollars for UC Berkeley, public safety programs, a new ferry service, and the Alice Waters foundation, an organization that provides lunches to public schools.


    Republican South Carolina Senator Jim Demint was among those angered. "Patriotic American taxpayers won't sit quietly while Berkeley insults our brave marines and tries to run them out of town, and the city doesn't deserve a single dime of special pet project handouts," said Senator Demint in a statement.

    Senator Demint has joined forces with five other Republican senators and an Orange County representative to introduce companion bills called the Semper Fi Act of 2008.

    One cut amounting to almost a quarter million dollars would impact the Chez Paniesse Foundation, which helps provide school meals to thousands of Berkeley public school students. Not surprisingly, Berkeley residents are shocked that the proposed legislation would go to such lengths.

    "If you want to give a slap on the hand of a community because of their opinion and viewpoint, that in itself is questionable. But to attack our children to do that is absolutely unconscionable," said Berkeley School District spokesman Mark Coplan.

Uh...I don't recall Mark Coplan registering any loud vocal complaints at the anti-Marine actions of the mayor and council. Maybe he did. But for him to drag "the children" into the argument is amusing since the Left always drags "the children" into their arguments for anything. Liberals don't like it when the same tactic is applied to them. Not too bad, not remotely sad.



Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker

Web Site Traffic Counters
Alabama Internet

Listed on BlogShares

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

This site uses photographs and material from other sources in strict
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.

Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.