Wednesday, February 07, 2007
RT Ryback Back At The State Trough
From WCCO News:
"Minneapolis faces a serious public safety challenge that requires us to continue to make significant investments to fight crime," said Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak on Tuesday, in a plea directed at Minnesota Legislators to restore local government aid to the city.
Minneapolis decided to spend money on a high-tech crime fighting device, the Shotspotter, a device that:
...utilizes patented technology to detect weapons-fire events over large, complex environments. ShotSpotter products range from systems for public safety agencies and 911 dispatch centers (which instantly identify, locate and give a visual of the location of a gunshot....
Boston has just approved $1.5 Million for their ShotSpotter system.
Soooooooo....I take it the Minneapolis "Peace Bus" and Lemonade Stands aren't the Criming Fighting tools that Minneapolis thought they would be?
And of course we have to consider the words of the great Minneapolis Star Tribune Sports Nonagenarian Sid Hartman, who says that all you need to combat crime is having large crowds of people. Why, who knew it was so simple!
Minneapolis and Saint Paul receive state funding for crime. Just last month, when State Republicans told both Rybak and St. Paul
How each city and its Mayor and City Council decide to spend it is their choice. Instead of spending it where it really needs to be spent - perhaps on hiring more Police Officers, especially those on street patrol - they spend it on non-human technology. Now, I'm not saying that the ShotSpotter doesn't have a purpose or that is doesn't help, in some way, to combat crime. But if you're the victim of a crime, who do you want helping you; an Officer or non-human technology?
Yeah, well - at least no one has to breathe Second-Hand Smoke in Minneapolis, right?
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.