Monday, September 11, 2006
The Path To 9/11, Part 1: Review
The performances by the all the actors are all very good. But the portrayal of Madeline Albright by actress Shirley Douglas just stands out as fantastic in an eerie blend of the Secretary of State Meets 'Mommy Dearest'.
Memorable moments in the film:
-The plan to use the electrical charge from a Casio wristwatch to serve as the detonator for a bomb.
-"Now we'll see if Janet Reno has any balls."
-At just about the two hour mark, the famous Bill Clinton video and audio of, "I did not have sexual relations...".
-"Are there any men left in Washington? Or all they all cowards?"
-Informing Pakistan of our intent to hit Osama Bin Laden with missiles only to have Pakistan inform Bin Laden, allowing him to escape.
-The "Clinton Is Satan" scene.
-No translators on hand to decipher and translate the Arabic handwritings and computer notes for the Field Agents. WOW! The Clinton Administration sure DROPPED THE BALL on this one, huh?
Because the Left consider themselves an entity that cannot ever be criticized, examined or graded, they are fit to be tied today over the portrayal of the inadequacies and failures of the Clinton Terms in "The Path To 9/11". Sometimes the portrayal of the truth hurts, doesn't it? Well, that's just too bad.
Sandy Berger, Richard Clarke, George Tenet - none of them really wanted to deal with terrorism or its perpetrators. But not dealing with it was the message sent down from the top, from Clinton himself. Boy, how the Left today likes to accuse George W. Bush as being a "Top Down" President. No president in history was more of a "Top Down" president than Bill Clinton.
Numerous chances to capture Bin Laden. Time and time again, over and over. And over. So many opportunities missed between 1993-2001. This is the true legacy of Bill Clinton no matter how hard his political operatives try to rewrite it.
The concluding two hours of "The Path To 9/11" begins at 7 PM Central, 8PM Eastern tonight on ABC-TV.
(And the Vikings will lose to the Redskins.)
I like what you said about Albright's portrayal. I listened to Drudge's radio show last night, and he played a clip of her. His reaction: "Someone throw water on her."
Albright's is a .... ugh, fill in the blank.
I somewhat appreciated it, it kept me glued to the screen, at least. The thoughts inspired by it were more personal as a non-American citizen on the other side of the world in primary school when the events happened, that of cross-culture, rather than to the virtue of the film itself.
But I would say it does have an effect - what I noticed especially was the music soundtrack they chose to play in the backdrop for some of the dramatic incidents. I think there was some intentional portrayal in the violent treatment of the terrorist suspects - all the background detail, the mudbrick houses, the urban sprawl in Africa - I think that was often something a bit more subtle to look at than the overt that is portrayed in the film .
You articluate that very well.
The pre-advertising done by the blogosphere and other media did hype its arrival. Too much political play of this docudrama was milked by the Liberals who protested the most. Last night, Part 2 was hardly kind or favorable to the Bush Administration.
Thanks for commenting and visiting, stay in touch.
Links to this post:
accordance and compliance with Fair Use Section 107 U.S. Copyright Code.
All other images and content © 2005-2009 David Drake.
Not responsible for content contained at linked sites.
Policy on commenting:
- Anonymous comments have little chance of being published.
- Comments made on posts 60 days old or older have little chance of being published.
- Published comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog author.
- Discretion of publishing or rejecting submitted comments rests solely with the owner and creator of this blog.
- Comments that egregiously "plug" (i.e. advertise or promote) another site or blog will be rejected. This doesn't mean you cannot include a link to your story, blog or to another site, but don't go overboard.
- Profanity is not a disqualifying factor, but profane rants solely for purposes of profanity are unlikely to be published.
- The owner and creator of this blog is not liable or responsible for the opinions of those who comment.